From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: i2c-ocores changes (version 2) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:03:20 -0700 Message-ID: <20101224040320.GF2491@angua.secretlab.ca> References: <1290615982-1028-1-git-send-email-jonas@southpole.se> <4CFC67AA.2080707@fluff.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CFC67AA.2080707-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Ben Dooks Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 04:33:46AM +0000, Ben Dooks wrote: > On 24/11/10 16:26, Jonas Bonn wrote: > > Version 2 of patch series incorporating initial feedback from review. > > > > /Jonas > > I'm relatively happy with this. > Any comments from the devicetree side? Patches 1 & 2 look good to me. Some comments on the 3rd patch. Acked-by: Grant Likely