From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 05:42:04 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3] drivers/hwmon NTC Thermistor Initial Message-Id: <20101224054204.GA30389@ericsson.com> List-Id: References: <1292842122-3992-1-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <1292842122-3992-1-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 09:37:37PM -0500, 함명주 wrote: > > Sender : Guenter Roeck > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 08:36:04PM -0500, MyungJoo Ham wrote: > > [ ... ] > > > >> +int ntc_thermistor_read(struct device *dev) > > > >> +{ > > > >> + ? ? ? return _ntc_thermistor_read(dev_get_drvdata(dev)); > > > >> +} > > > > > > > > Function should be removed since it is no longer exported. > > > > > > > > > > I have been considering to use this function at the board file in the > > > kernel space. > > > > That means you would have to export the function, and we are back to square one, > > ie you really use a hwmon driver to provide functions to a non-hwmon driver. > > > > Yes, this hwmon driver is used by another (board file) when CONFIG_HWMON and > CONFIG_NTC_.... is "y". Otherwise, the code that requires hwmon driver is not > compiled and a dummy is used instead. Thus, we don't need EXPORT anyway. > After browsing through the kernel source - such a dependency on CONFIG_HWMON would be the first in the kernel. I think such a dependency is broken, and I won't be the one to approve it. Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors