From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Casey Dahlin Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Fixes bug: GIT_PS1_SHOWDIRTYSTATE is no not respect diff.ignoreSubmodules config variable Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:43:57 -0500 Message-ID: <20101227224357.GA9947@foucault.redhat.com> References: <1293240049-7744-1-git-send-email-zapped@mail.ru> <1293240049-7744-3-git-send-email-zapped@mail.ru> <4D15E48A.9050805@web.de> <7vd3ooz6qd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4D187511.3090104@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jens Lehmann , Junio C Hamano , Zapped , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Dec 27 23:44:20 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PXLng-0002Fq-6t for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 23:44:20 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751782Ab0L0WoI (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:44:08 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34457 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751495Ab0L0WoH (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:44:07 -0500 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBRMi0Bv010312 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:44:00 -0500 Received: from foucault.redhat.com (vpn-8-120.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.8.120]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBRMhvr5014338 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:43:59 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:06:38PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Note: I do not think that the "plumbing" concept was not well-intended, > but I doubt that the concept holds up in the face of reality. > I've always felt that plumbing commands existed to expose the C portion of git to the bash portion of git. As the latter shrinks plumbing commands make less sense (and offering those commands as a library makes more sense, which is unfortunately close to impossible in the current git source). --CJD