From: Simon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: System CPU increasing on idle 2.6.36
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:03:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101229220313.GA13688@hostway.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101218010801.GE28367@hostway.ca>
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 05:08:01PM -0800, Simon Kirby wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:25:05PM -0800, Simon Kirby wrote:
>
> > Possibly related to the flush-processes-taking-CPU issues I saw
> > previously, I thought this was interesting. I found a log-crunching box
> > that does all of its work via NFS and spends most of the day sleeping.
> > It has been using a linearly-increasing amount of system time during the
> > time where is sleeping. munin graph:
> >
> > http://0x.ca/sim/ref/2.6.36/cpu_logcrunch_nfs.png
> >...
> > Known 2.6.36 issue? This did not occur on 2.6.35.4, according to the
> > munin graphs. I'll try 2.6.37-rc an see if it changes.
>
> So, back on this topic,
>
> It seems that system CPU from "flush" processes is still increasing
> during and after periods of NFS activity, even with 2.6.37-rc5-git4:
>
> http://0x.ca/sim/ref/2.6.37/cpu_nfs.png
>
> Something is definitely going on while NFS is active, and then keeps
> happening in the idle periods. top and perf top look the same as in
> 2.6.36. No userland activity at all, but the kernel keeps doing stuff.
>
> I could bisect this, but I have to wait a day for each build, unless I
> can come up with a way to reproduce it more quickly. The mount points
> for which the flush processes are active are the two mount points where
> the logs are read from, rotated, compressed, and unlinked, and where the
> reports are written, running in parallel under an xargs -P 15.
>
> I'm pretty sure the only syscalls that are reproducing this are read(),
> readdir(), lstat(), write(), rename(), unlink(), and close(). There's
> nothing special happening here...
I've noticed nfs_inode_cache is ever-increasing as well with 2.6.37:
OBJS ACTIVE USE OBJ SIZE SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME
2562514 2541520 99% 0.95K 78739 33 2519648K nfs_inode_cache
467200 285110 61% 0.02K 1825 256 7300K kmalloc-16
299397 242350 80% 0.19K 14257 21 57028K dentry
217434 131978 60% 0.55K 7767 28 124272K radix_tree_node
215232 81522 37% 0.06K 3363 64 13452K kmalloc-64
183027 136802 74% 0.10K 4693 39 18772K buffer_head
101120 71184 70% 0.03K 790 128 3160K kmalloc-32
79616 59713 75% 0.12K 2488 32 9952K kmalloc-128
66560 41257 61% 0.01K 130 512 520K kmalloc-8
42126 26650 63% 0.75K 2006 21 32096K ext3_inode_cache
http://0x.ca/sim/ref/2.6.37/inodes_nfs.png
http://0x.ca/sim/ref/2.6.37/cpu2_nfs.png
Perhaps I could bisect just fs/nfs changes between 2.6.35 and 2.6.36 to
try to track this down without having to wait too long, unless somebody
can see what is happening here.
Simon-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-29 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-08 21:25 System CPU increasing on idle 2.6.36 Simon Kirby
2010-12-08 21:53 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-12-08 22:36 ` Simon Kirby
2010-12-09 4:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-12-14 23:38 ` Simon Kirby
2010-12-15 1:10 ` Simon Kirby
2010-12-15 1:56 ` Simon Kirby
2010-12-15 18:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-12-15 18:22 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-12-15 18:38 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-12-15 19:33 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-12-15 19:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-12-15 19:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-12-15 20:19 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-12-15 20:32 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-12-15 21:48 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-12-15 22:15 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-12-15 22:29 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-12-15 22:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-12-15 23:58 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-12-16 0:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-27 0:39 ` NFS client growing system CPU Simon Kirby
2011-09-27 11:42 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-09-27 16:49 ` Simon Kirby
2011-09-27 17:04 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-09-28 19:58 ` Simon Kirby
2011-09-30 0:58 ` Simon Kirby
2011-09-30 1:11 ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-10-05 23:07 ` Simon Kirby
2010-12-18 1:08 ` System CPU increasing on idle 2.6.36 Simon Kirby
2010-12-21 20:31 ` Mark Moseley
2010-12-29 22:03 ` Simon Kirby [this message]
2011-01-04 17:42 ` Mark Moseley
2011-01-04 21:40 ` Simon Kirby
2011-01-05 19:43 ` Mark Moseley
2011-01-07 18:05 ` Mark Moseley
2011-01-07 18:12 ` Mark Moseley
2011-01-07 19:33 ` Mark Moseley
2011-01-08 0:52 ` Simon Kirby
2011-01-08 1:30 ` Mark Moseley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101229220313.GA13688@hostway.ca \
--to=sim@hostway.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.