From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755134Ab1ACOBN (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jan 2011 09:01:13 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:64430 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754933Ab1ACOBL (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jan 2011 09:01:11 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=JV0lkVdfPQDbOX8baI1Da/wpd7IhDfa1mLVHmt8sNYai4e2kdQX6OshPKieNXKh2r6 3vDperdb1x6bG1FzluBmIMli8V2l/5cq9DYHyWFrnGWLuN7flMlsjvoEeLxdcyQWDKTg gxFLu+CPOtO+2eWojkEm3PzPkT5JJfaTA2yis= Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 15:01:07 +0100 From: Tejun Heo To: Steven Whitehouse Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christine Caulfield , David Teigland , cluster-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/32] dlm: dlm workqueues aren't used in memory reclaim path Message-ID: <20110103140107.GP18831@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1294062595-30097-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1294062595-30097-25-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1294063107.2429.34.camel@dolmen> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1294063107.2429.34.camel@dolmen> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 01:58:27PM +0000, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > Hi, > > You already acked a patch to do this, which is in the DLM git tree, > waiting for the next merge window: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/teigland/dlm.git;a=commitdiff;h=dcce240ead802d42b1e45ad2fcb2ed4a399cb255 Ooh, I see. Hmmm... maybe I've asked this before but do you really need WQ_MEM_RECLAIM there? Is dlm used during memory reclaim? Thanks. -- tejun