From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: "Ramirez Luna, Omar" <omar.ramirez@ti.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] staging: tidspbridge for 2.6.38
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:57:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110105235748.GB22850@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikWpxq+35pLN_r6B214jcO2Ss2rEv0KA9bcMJFL@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:47:47PM -0600, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 02:15:43AM -0600, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
> >> Hi Greg,
> >>
> >> This is the first pull request of changes for tidspbridge driver for 2.6.38,
> >> I expect to make another request with at least one bug fix, but in the mean
> >> time here it is the content for this one:
> >>
> >> The following changes since commit 90a8a73c06cc32b609a880d48449d7083327e11a:
> >>
> >> Linux 2.6.37-rc7 (2010-12-21 11:26:40 -0800)
> >>
> >> are available in the git repository at:
> >> git://dev.omapzoom.org/pub/scm/tidspbridge/kernel-dspbridge.git dspbridge
> >
> > Ick, no. Why did you base this on -rc7? My staging-next branch is
> > based on -rc5 at the moment, and I really see no need to merge the rest
> > of them into the tree for no good reason at all.
>
> wrongly though staging-next would be at rc7+ at the time you could
> take a look to the patches
Why would I want to sync it? You can (and should) always go off of my
current staging-next tree if you are wanting me to take a git pull.
It's ok if it is an older version, fast-forwards are just fine.
> > Also, as you did send this before the merge window closed, but during
> > the holidays, I couldn't get to it. But in looking at this, it's going
> > to have to wait for the next window, sorry, it's just too big, and too
> > late. You weren't expecting me to be working on kernel stuff during my
> > holiday break, were you?
>
> No I wasn't :)
>
> > So, feel free to redo this against 2.6.38-rc1 when that comes out.
>
> No problem then, but could you consider a 2nd pull with a compilation
> fix (which will be introduced in 2.6.38, right now present in
> linux-next), and a bug fix.
I'll always take patches for bugfixes, but please wait for after I sync
my current tree with Linus before I can do anything with it.
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-05 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-24 8:15 [GIT PULL] staging: tidspbridge for 2.6.38 Omar Ramirez Luna
2011-01-05 21:18 ` Greg KH
2011-01-05 23:47 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2011-01-05 23:57 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110105235748.GB22850@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=omar.ramirez@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.