All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: consolidate the name of root_task_group and init_task_group
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:17:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110107071736.GA32635@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1294378950.8823.36.camel@marge.simson.net>

On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 06:42:30AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 12:43 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> > root_task_group is the leftover of USER_SCHED, now it's always
> > same to init_task_group.
> 
> Wouldn't the reverse be better?  It's root as in tree.

Well, I have no bias to either of them. Keeping init_task_group is
just that we can touch less lines. :)

If you want root_task_group, here it is:
---
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: consolidate the name of root_task_group and init_task_group

root_task_group is the leftover of USER_SCHED, now it's always
same to init_task_group.
But as Mike suggested, root_task_group is maybe the suitable name
to keep for a tree.
So in this patch:
  init_task_group      --> root_task_group
  init_task_group_load --> root_task_group_load
  INIT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD --> ROOT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD

Suggested-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 include/linux/sched.h    |    2 +-
 kernel/sched.c           |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 kernel/sched_autogroup.c |    6 +++---
 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 883ad10..a6b04a0 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2500,7 +2500,7 @@ extern void normalize_rt_tasks(void);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
 
-extern struct task_group init_task_group;
+extern struct task_group root_task_group;
 
 extern struct task_group *sched_create_group(struct task_group *parent);
 extern void sched_destroy_group(struct task_group *tg);
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 114a0de..35a8046 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -278,14 +278,12 @@ struct task_group {
 #endif
 };
 
-#define root_task_group init_task_group
-
 /* task_group_lock serializes the addition/removal of task groups */
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(task_group_lock);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
 
-# define INIT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD	NICE_0_LOAD
+# define ROOT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD	NICE_0_LOAD
 
 /*
  * A weight of 0 or 1 can cause arithmetics problems.
@@ -298,13 +296,13 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(task_group_lock);
 #define MIN_SHARES	2
 #define MAX_SHARES	(1UL << 18)
 
-static int init_task_group_load = INIT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD;
+static int root_task_group_load = ROOT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD;
 #endif
 
 /* Default task group.
  *	Every task in system belong to this group at bootup.
  */
-struct task_group init_task_group;
+struct task_group root_task_group;
 
 #endif	/* CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED */
 
@@ -7848,7 +7846,7 @@ static void init_tg_cfs_entry(struct task_group *tg, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
 	cfs_rq->tg = tg;
 
 	tg->se[cpu] = se;
-	/* se could be NULL for init_task_group */
+	/* se could be NULL for root_task_group */
 	if (!se)
 		return;
 
@@ -7908,18 +7906,18 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 		ptr = (unsigned long)kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_NOWAIT);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
-		init_task_group.se = (struct sched_entity **)ptr;
+		root_task_group.se = (struct sched_entity **)ptr;
 		ptr += nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(void **);
 
-		init_task_group.cfs_rq = (struct cfs_rq **)ptr;
+		root_task_group.cfs_rq = (struct cfs_rq **)ptr;
 		ptr += nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(void **);
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
 #ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
-		init_task_group.rt_se = (struct sched_rt_entity **)ptr;
+		root_task_group.rt_se = (struct sched_rt_entity **)ptr;
 		ptr += nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(void **);
 
-		init_task_group.rt_rq = (struct rt_rq **)ptr;
+		root_task_group.rt_rq = (struct rt_rq **)ptr;
 		ptr += nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(void **);
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
@@ -7939,13 +7937,13 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 			global_rt_period(), global_rt_runtime());
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
-	init_rt_bandwidth(&init_task_group.rt_bandwidth,
+	init_rt_bandwidth(&root_task_group.rt_bandwidth,
 			global_rt_period(), global_rt_runtime());
 #endif /* CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
-	list_add(&init_task_group.list, &task_groups);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&init_task_group.children);
+	list_add(&root_task_group.list, &task_groups);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&root_task_group.children);
 	autogroup_init(&init_task);
 #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED */
 
@@ -7960,34 +7958,34 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 		init_cfs_rq(&rq->cfs, rq);
 		init_rt_rq(&rq->rt, rq);
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
-		init_task_group.shares = init_task_group_load;
+		root_task_group.shares = root_task_group_load;
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list);
 		/*
-		 * How much cpu bandwidth does init_task_group get?
+		 * How much cpu bandwidth does root_task_group get?
 		 *
 		 * In case of task-groups formed thr' the cgroup filesystem, it
 		 * gets 100% of the cpu resources in the system. This overall
 		 * system cpu resource is divided among the tasks of
-		 * init_task_group and its child task-groups in a fair manner,
+		 * root_task_group and its child task-groups in a fair manner,
 		 * based on each entity's (task or task-group's) weight
 		 * (se->load.weight).
 		 *
-		 * In other words, if init_task_group has 10 tasks of weight
+		 * In other words, if root_task_group has 10 tasks of weight
 		 * 1024) and two child groups A0 and A1 (of weight 1024 each),
 		 * then A0's share of the cpu resource is:
 		 *
 		 *	A0's bandwidth = 1024 / (10*1024 + 1024 + 1024) = 8.33%
 		 *
-		 * We achieve this by letting init_task_group's tasks sit
-		 * directly in rq->cfs (i.e init_task_group->se[] = NULL).
+		 * We achieve this by letting root_task_group's tasks sit
+		 * directly in rq->cfs (i.e root_task_group->se[] = NULL).
 		 */
-		init_tg_cfs_entry(&init_task_group, &rq->cfs, NULL, i, NULL);
+		init_tg_cfs_entry(&root_task_group, &rq->cfs, NULL, i, NULL);
 #endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
 
 		rq->rt.rt_runtime = def_rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime;
 #ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->leaf_rt_rq_list);
-		init_tg_rt_entry(&init_task_group, &rq->rt, NULL, i, NULL);
+		init_tg_rt_entry(&root_task_group, &rq->rt, NULL, i, NULL);
 #endif
 
 		for (j = 0; j < CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX; j++)
@@ -8814,7 +8812,7 @@ cpu_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cgrp)
 
 	if (!cgrp->parent) {
 		/* This is early initialization for the top cgroup */
-		return &init_task_group.css;
+		return &root_task_group.css;
 	}
 
 	parent = cgroup_tg(cgrp->parent);
diff --git a/kernel/sched_autogroup.c b/kernel/sched_autogroup.c
index c80fedc..e011e53 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_autogroup.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_autogroup.c
@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ static atomic_t autogroup_seq_nr;
 
 static void autogroup_init(struct task_struct *init_task)
 {
-	autogroup_default.tg = &init_task_group;
-	init_task_group.autogroup = &autogroup_default;
+	autogroup_default.tg = &root_task_group;
+	root_task_group.autogroup = &autogroup_default;
 	kref_init(&autogroup_default.kref);
 	init_rwsem(&autogroup_default.lock);
 	init_task->signal->autogroup = &autogroup_default;
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static inline struct autogroup *autogroup_create(void)
 	if (!ag)
 		goto out_fail;
 
-	tg = sched_create_group(&init_task_group);
+	tg = sched_create_group(&root_task_group);
 
 	if (IS_ERR(tg))
 		goto out_free;
-- 
1.7.0.4

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-07  7:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-07  4:43 [PATCH] sched: remove root_task_group Yong Zhang
2011-01-07  5:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-07  7:17   ` Yong Zhang [this message]
2011-01-07  8:59     ` [PATCH] sched: consolidate the name of root_task_group and init_task_group Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-07 15:35     ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Consolidate " tip-bot for Yong Zhang
2011-01-07  8:57 ` [PATCH] sched: remove root_task_group Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110107071736.GA32635@windriver.com \
    --to=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.