From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from ibawizard.net
	([82.208.49.253] helo=mengele.ibawizard.net ident=postfix)
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <ynezz@mengele.ibawizard.net>) id 1Pb8Ak-00063Y-QS
	for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Fri, 07 Jan 2011 09:59:47 +0100
Received: by mengele.ibawizard.net (Postfix, from userid 1002)
	id CB14A1D366AF; Fri,  7 Jan 2011 09:49:50 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 09:49:50 +0100
From: Petr =?iso-8859-2?Q?=A9tetiar?= <ynezz@true.cz>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Message-ID: <20110107084950.GA2466@ibawizard.net>
References: <AANLkTink9h1dkjww1+Vi3arnTagSF2yCwygSHnPLcTdU@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTink9h1dkjww1+Vi3arnTagSF2yCwygSHnPLcTdU@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Subject: Re: [RFC] linux 2.6.36: upgrade to 2.6.36.2
X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions
	<openembedded-devel.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 08:59:47 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Frans Meulenbroeks <fransmeulenbroeks@gmail.com> [2011-01-04 22:12:29]:

> Seems Petr, Eric and Robert are involved in these two machines.
> Care to comment on moving to 2.6.36.2 (or give it a stab)?

Hi,

thank you for asking, you've my ack. I just wonder, if it's necessary to ask
the maintainers of other machines using this kernel recipe for such small
kernel patchlevel bump.

-- ynezz