From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755540Ab1AGUdK (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:33:10 -0500 Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:49074 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755453Ab1AGUdI (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:33:08 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=fVkfM0X+sWiTii/N5T6q5+Nj2Qa5uj4YncQ19L2VcMF9JeD/p0//spQm3cM06BzAjb ms143THJfkyakWboeQf8m5KRnD1AEpZ44P504BNFSdT95P3EidJ208w7uX/4tU7gIzI5 X0ijFTE+umDwwZ/uM9qwTX1LgsLs++izPFV/E= Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:33:04 -0500 From: Tejun Heo To: David Rientjes Cc: Jan Beulich , Ingo Molnar , tglx@linutronix.de, "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: unify "numa=" command line option handling Message-ID: <20110107203304.GC7355@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <4D2603BF020000780002ACA7@vpn.id2.novell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:36:41PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > I like the idea in general, but I think it may collide with Tejun's NUMA > unification patchset for x86, which I assume will another revision once > the merge window for .38 closes? Or maybe he'd like to merge your patch > with his series and push it as one? Peter, what's the status of the patchset? Is there something which is holding it from being merged into x86/numa? Are you simply waiting for the rc1 window to close? Thanks. -- tejun