From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: unify "numa=" command line option handling
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:37:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110107203750.GD7355@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D26D3FD020000780002AED9@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Hello, Jan.
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 07:51:09AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > I like the idea in general, but I think it may collide with Tejun's NUMA
> > unification patchset for x86, which I assume will another revision once
> > the merge window for .38 closes? Or maybe he'd like to merge your patch
> > with his series and push it as one?
>
> I would assume that if unification is done, then the command line
> option would become common too. Tejun?
The unification isn't full and the parameter handling hasn't been
moved yet, so yeah, either your patch can go in first and I can
refresh my series on top of it or vice-versa.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-07 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-06 17:02 [PATCH] x86: unify "numa=" command line option handling Jan Beulich
2011-01-06 20:36 ` David Rientjes
2011-01-07 7:51 ` Jan Beulich
2011-01-07 9:58 ` David Rientjes
2011-01-07 10:06 ` Jan Beulich
2011-01-07 12:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-01-07 13:32 ` Jan Beulich
2011-01-07 14:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-01-07 14:26 ` Jan Beulich
2011-01-07 15:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-01-07 19:55 ` David Rientjes
2011-01-10 8:14 ` Jan Beulich
2011-01-07 20:37 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-01-07 20:33 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-07 20:36 ` David Rientjes
2011-01-07 20:43 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-07 20:46 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110107203750.GD7355@mtj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.