From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: asm-generic support
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 21:31:27 +0100
Message-ID: <201101092131.27694.arnd@arndb.de>
References: <20110108130302.GA21698@merkur.ravnborg.org> <20110109192707.GA12387@merkur.ravnborg.org> <20110109192907.GA12403@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110109192907.GA12403@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>, linux arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, Guan Xuetao <guanxuetao@mprc.pku.edu.cn>, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org

> There is an increasing amount of header files
> shared between individual architectures in asm-generic.
> To avoid a lot of dummy wrapper files that just
> include the corresponding file in asm-generic provide
> some basic support in kbuild for this.

Looks almost perfect to me now.

I was about to reply with Reviewed-by, but then it occurred to me
that scripts/asm-generic.sh is really much more complicated
than doing the same in Makefile syntax.

You already create the wrapper files during headers-install, so why
not also create them from make, where we already have access to the
file lists in a convenient format.

Or is there a problem getting at stuff defined in the Kbuild files
from the prepare stage?

	Arnd