From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5][RT] [GIT PULL] rt: Port of Lai Jiangshan's rt patch
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 22:53:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110111035355.643480133@goodmis.org> (raw)
Thomas,
I finally got Lai's patch to a point that I'm happy with it.
The first 4 patches are clean ups to help in applying Lai's patch
at the end.
I've tested this patch series by running dbench 100 in a loop
and it crashes as much as mainline 2.6.33 does ;-) so I'm pretty
happy with it.
The following patches are in:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-rt.git
branch: rt/tip/rt/devel
Lai Jiangshan (1):
rtmutex: Ensure only the top waiter or higher priority task can take the lock
Steven Rostedt (4):
rtmutex: Only save lock depth once in spin_slowlock
rtmutex: Try to take lock early in rt_spin_lock_slowlock()
rtmutex: Revert Optimize rt lock wakeup
rtmutex: Fix comment about why new_owner can be NULL in wake_futex_pi()
----
kernel/futex.c | 20 +-
kernel/rt.c | 10 +-
kernel/rtmutex-debug.c | 1 -
kernel/rtmutex.c | 478 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
kernel/rtmutex_common.h | 18 +--
5 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 323 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2011-01-11 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-11 3:53 Steven Rostedt [this message]
2011-01-11 3:53 ` [PATCH 1/5][RT] rtmutex: Only save lock depth once in spin_slowlock Steven Rostedt
2011-01-11 3:53 ` [PATCH 2/5][RT] rtmutex: Try to take lock early in rt_spin_lock_slowlock() Steven Rostedt
2011-01-11 3:53 ` [PATCH 3/5][RT] rtmutex: Revert Optimize rt lock wakeup Steven Rostedt
2011-01-11 3:53 ` [PATCH 4/5][RT] rtmutex: Fix comment about why new_owner can be NULL in wake_futex_pi() Steven Rostedt
2011-01-11 3:54 ` [PATCH 5/5][RT] rtmutex: Ensure only the top waiter or higher priority task can take the lock Steven Rostedt
2011-01-11 8:24 ` [PATCH 0/5][RT] [GIT PULL] rt: Port of Lai Jiangshan's rt patch Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110111035355.643480133@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.