From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pck6C-00062X-Kt for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:41:44 +0100 Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so19489217fxm.6 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:41:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=9WPdsYEx3DzL7xhDr5+F59FcRQGcul/QOqYtKqrenuM=; b=H7onEUXQTejd9WsHFjklANFwNZehU1dhe4OSrchmWuQsw80hYtgRCYPpNId7llw6kL z3bWVHd6wjEmVR+dHGbJouaQYQ/n1GsYJwieBM/Jpnf063M9Y/G2rTXqMQrawS3775I3 HdwPafnnNooSbyX4RzJZISfOFV0n8CrKOtSHk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=tVKWRU7X71LHoVS5qHnyXbqLp5IsHWn2eXacDmh0AptBprMht2oBuj+m8fT8JN5Opo OpH6owWwy6OWjvqt1bwM3G3CNSEgLW0bGPGRZ9+85qhOUUYK0cfK2anjYMEgvezooZXx 1N8Xxj7A2gPOfyAa2jUQOGaquSv6gCqoRavQc= Received: by 10.223.72.14 with SMTP id k14mr33933faj.45.1294774873384; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:41:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from s42.loc (85-127-155-31.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at [85.127.155.31]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a2sm7547824faw.46.2011.01.11.11.41.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:41:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from cow by s42.loc with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pck5e-0001r0-6f; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:41:10 +0100 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:41:10 +0100 From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20110111194110.GC6584@mx.loc> References: <1294084926-3115-1-git-send-email-rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> <1294084926-3115-9-git-send-email-rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> <201101032354.25037.roman@khimov.ru> <4D230B5A.3030202@gmx.de> <4D23186C.8080803@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4D23186C.8080803@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] busybox: provide postrm for package mdev X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:41:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 01:54:04PM +0100, Wolfgang Hauser wrote: >I agree for the test statement, but that may be solved by using īthe >brackets in the long statement. > >Otavio Salvador schrieb: >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 09:58, Wolfgang Hauser wrote: >>> Keep it simple and stupid! >>> So I vote for the long, readable and less error prone version. >> >> I usually prefer the KISS however on this specific case I disagree. >> >> The new code avoid using test and a fork. This allows for "test" >> applet removal if desired. >> >> I prefer the ugly but more "embedded like" code. remember that this stuff potentially ends up on the target, so KISS (byte-wise) is always the preferred way. And yes, update-rc.d and the required inode itself is bloat, but heck, if you want online pkg-management you have to take that penalty, FWIW. So.. Can i please have an explicit ACK for that space-saver?