From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] xen: events: improve event channel IRQ allocation strategy. Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:40:27 -0500 Message-ID: <20110111204027.GA16286@dumpdata.com> References: <1294766389.3831.5902.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20110111183459.GA29378@dumpdata.com> <1294773918.12280.54.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1294773918.12280.54.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Campbell Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , xen-devel , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 07:25:18PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 18:34 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > > > The series has been tested as: > > > * PV guest with a PCI passthrough device. > > > > Which type of domain0? A 2.6.37 + Xen PCI backend + your patches? > > Or the older 2.6.32? > > The 2.6.32 variant. Same for the HVM test. Dom 0 was 2.6.37 + patches. Ok. Could you test the PV guest with a PCI passthrough device on a PV domain 0 that is 2.6.37 based? It _should_ work but it never hurts to try. For your convience I've put up a merge tree with stable/* patches, devel/irq.rework (has mine and these patches you have posted), devel/xen-pciback, devel/gntdev (Stefano's last posting) It is devel/next-2.6.37