From: marek.vasut@gmail.com (Marek Vasut)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5 v2] ARM: pxa: Fix recursive call of pxa_(un)mask_low_gpio()
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:30:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201101122330.47281.marek.vasut@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikOUHOC2nrfKpcO=rE=CbdthvU0JxbCtOc1piSK@mail.gmail.com>
On Wednesday 12 January 2011 00:16:50 Eric Miao wrote:
> The original intention is to re-use pxa_{mask,unmask}_irq(), will
> the change below looks better? The move of irq_base() is to avoid
> the error of function not declared.
Here's your :
Tested-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Tested on Zipit Z2
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
> index a7deff5..6107253 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,17 @@ static inline int cpu_has_ipr(void)
> return !cpu_is_pxa25x();
> }
>
> +static inline void __iomem *irq_base(int i)
> +{
> + static unsigned long phys_base[] = {
> + 0x40d00000,
> + 0x40d0009c,
> + 0x40d00130,
> + };
> +
> + return (void __iomem *)io_p2v(phys_base[i]);
> +}
> +
> static void pxa_mask_irq(unsigned int irq)
> {
> void __iomem *base = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
> @@ -108,25 +119,11 @@ static void pxa_ack_low_gpio(unsigned int irq)
> GEDR0 = (1 << (irq - IRQ_GPIO0));
> }
>
> -static void pxa_mask_low_gpio(unsigned int irq)
> -{
> - struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> -
> - desc->chip->mask(irq);
> -}
> -
> -static void pxa_unmask_low_gpio(unsigned int irq)
> -{
> - struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> -
> - desc->chip->unmask(irq);
> -}
> -
> static struct irq_chip pxa_low_gpio_chip = {
> .name = "GPIO-l",
> .ack = pxa_ack_low_gpio,
> - .mask = pxa_mask_low_gpio,
> - .unmask = pxa_unmask_low_gpio,
> + .mask = pxa_mask_irq,
> + .unmask = pxa_unmask_irq,
> .set_type = pxa_set_low_gpio_type,
> };
>
> @@ -141,6 +138,7 @@ static void __init pxa_init_low_gpio_irq(set_wake_t fn)
>
> for (irq = IRQ_GPIO0; irq <= IRQ_GPIO1; irq++) {
> set_irq_chip(irq, &pxa_low_gpio_chip);
> + set_irq_chip_data(irq, irq_base(0));
> set_irq_handler(irq, handle_edge_irq);
> set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
> }
> @@ -148,17 +146,6 @@ static void __init pxa_init_low_gpio_irq(set_wake_t
> fn) pxa_low_gpio_chip.set_wake = fn;
> }
>
> -static inline void __iomem *irq_base(int i)
> -{
> - static unsigned long phys_base[] = {
> - 0x40d00000,
> - 0x40d0009c,
> - 0x40d00130,
> - };
> -
> - return (void __iomem *)io_p2v(phys_base[i]);
> -}
> -
> void __init pxa_init_irq(int irq_nr, set_wake_t fn)
> {
> int irq, i, n;
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > v2: Remove dead code as proposed by Sergei
> >
> > arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c | 8 ++------
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
> > index a7deff5..76e69cf 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
> > @@ -110,16 +110,12 @@ static void pxa_ack_low_gpio(unsigned int irq)
> >
> > static void pxa_mask_low_gpio(unsigned int irq)
> > {
> > - struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> > -
> > - desc->chip->mask(irq);
> > + pxa_mask_irq(irq);
> > }
> >
> > static void pxa_unmask_low_gpio(unsigned int irq)
> > {
> > - struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> > -
> > - desc->chip->unmask(irq);
> > + pxa_unmask_irq(irq);
> > }
> >
> > static struct irq_chip pxa_low_gpio_chip = {
> > --
> > 1.7.2.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-12 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-10 22:53 [PATCH 1/5 resend] pxa: Fix warning in zeus.c Marek Vasut
2011-01-10 22:53 ` [PATCH 2/5 resend] pxa: Remove unused variable in clock-pxa3xx.c Marek Vasut
2011-01-10 22:53 ` [PATCH 3/5 resend] ARM: pxa: Use cpu_has_ipr() consistently in irq.c Marek Vasut
2011-01-10 22:53 ` [PATCH 4/5 v2] ARM: pxa: Fix suspend/resume array index miscalculation Marek Vasut
2011-01-10 23:41 ` Eric Miao
2011-01-10 23:46 ` Marek Vasut
2011-01-11 22:45 ` Eric Miao
2011-01-10 22:53 ` [PATCH 5/5 v2] ARM: pxa: Fix recursive call of pxa_(un)mask_low_gpio() Marek Vasut
2011-01-11 23:16 ` Eric Miao
2011-01-12 22:29 ` Marek Vasut
2011-01-12 22:30 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2011-01-12 12:48 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201101122330.47281.marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.