From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Make register_card API available to drivers Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:42:03 +0000 Message-ID: <20110113114203.GA30351@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1294901358-14364-1-git-send-email-vinod.koul@intel.com> <20110113112607.GA9936@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <438BB0150E931F4B9CE701519A4463010844671F9B@bgsmsx502.gar.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9C324601 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:44:18 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <438BB0150E931F4B9CE701519A4463010844671F9B@bgsmsx502.gar.corp.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: "Koul, Vinod" Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "Harsha, Priya" , "Bensaid, Selma" , "lrg@slimlogic.co.uk" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 05:06:19PM +0530, Koul, Vinod wrote: > Yes on both of these, but I didn't want to break current method. > So I kept these to ensure both methods work fine. > One we have converted all driver to use register then we can remove these. > Would have made sense to put a comment for that My plan for this when I originally wrote the comment had been to make the contents of the soc-audio device probe and removal look exactly like what you'd write directly in a machine driver so no code except for the code doing the soc-audio device had any idea it was there. This would keep backwards compatiblity without special casing, making things more maintainable.