From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 06:50:22 +0000 Subject: Re: R_SPARC_13 Message-Id: <20110117.225022.59651505.davem@davemloft.net> List-Id: References: <20110117.130238.245404805.davem@davemloft.net> <1295307243.32152.106.camel@duncow> <20110117.163709.15244083.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20110117.163709.15244083.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: richm@oldelvet.org.uk Cc: 609371@bugs.debian.org, ben@decadent.org.uk, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com, Jesper.Nilsson@axis.com, jeffm@suse.com From: David Miller Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:37:09 -0800 (PST) > So we do end up seeing the R_SPARC_LO10 + R_SPARC_13 sequences in the > final module object. > > Therefore, we really should handle R_SPARC_13 in the sparc module loader. Ok, I now feel like I'm hallucinating. davem@sunset:~/src/GIT/linux-2.6-stable$ uname -a Linux sunset 2.6.37 #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 20:14:59 PST 2011 sparc64 GNU/Linux davem@sunset:~/src/GIT/linux-2.6-stable$ objdump --reloc /lib/modules/2.6.37/kernel/net/ipv6/ipv6.ko | grep R_SPARC_13 0000000000000c7c R_SPARC_13 *ABS*+0x0000000000000004 0000000000001ae4 R_SPARC_13 *ABS*+0x0000000000000018 0000000000001b0c R_SPARC_13 *ABS*+0x0000000000000008 ... davem@sunset:~/src/GIT/linux-2.6-stable$ lsmod | grep ipv6 ipv6 240422 12 davem@sunset:~/src/GIT/linux-2.6-stable$ I must be missing something obvious. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753080Ab1ARGtu (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:49:50 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:44411 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750812Ab1ARGts (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:49:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:50:22 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20110117.225022.59651505.davem@davemloft.net> To: richm@oldelvet.org.uk Cc: 609371@bugs.debian.org, ben@decadent.org.uk, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com, Jesper.Nilsson@axis.com, jeffm@suse.com Subject: Re: R_SPARC_13 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20110117.163709.15244083.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20110117.130238.245404805.davem@davemloft.net> <1295307243.32152.106.camel@duncow> <20110117.163709.15244083.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: David Miller Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:37:09 -0800 (PST) > So we do end up seeing the R_SPARC_LO10 + R_SPARC_13 sequences in the > final module object. > > Therefore, we really should handle R_SPARC_13 in the sparc module loader. Ok, I now feel like I'm hallucinating. davem@sunset:~/src/GIT/linux-2.6-stable$ uname -a Linux sunset 2.6.37 #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 20:14:59 PST 2011 sparc64 GNU/Linux davem@sunset:~/src/GIT/linux-2.6-stable$ objdump --reloc /lib/modules/2.6.37/kernel/net/ipv6/ipv6.ko | grep R_SPARC_13 0000000000000c7c R_SPARC_13 *ABS*+0x0000000000000004 0000000000001ae4 R_SPARC_13 *ABS*+0x0000000000000018 0000000000001b0c R_SPARC_13 *ABS*+0x0000000000000008 ... davem@sunset:~/src/GIT/linux-2.6-stable$ lsmod | grep ipv6 ipv6 240422 12 davem@sunset:~/src/GIT/linux-2.6-stable$ I must be missing something obvious.