From: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: Emulate MSI-X table in kernel
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:18:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201101172018.22478.sheng@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110117115447.GA8145@amt.cnet>
On Monday 17 January 2011 19:54:47 Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 06:19:44PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > Then we can support mask bit operation of assigned devices now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > arch/x86/kvm/Makefile | 2 +-
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 +-
> > include/linux/kvm.h | 21 ++++
> > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 25 ++++
> > virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c | 44 +++++++
> > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 38 ++++++-
> > virt/kvm/msix_mmio.c | 284
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ virt/kvm/msix_mmio.h
> > | 25 ++++
> > 8 files changed, 440 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 virt/kvm/msix_mmio.c
> > create mode 100644 virt/kvm/msix_mmio.h
> >
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c b/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
> > index ae72ae6..7444dcd 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
> > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > #include "irq.h"
> >
> > +#include "msix_mmio.h"
> >
> > static struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *kvm_find_assigned_dev(struct
> > list_head *head,
> >
> > int assigned_dev_id)
> >
> > @@ -191,12 +192,25 @@ static void kvm_free_assigned_irq(struct kvm *kvm,
> >
> > kvm_deassign_irq(kvm, assigned_dev, assigned_dev->irq_requested_type);
> >
> > }
> >
> > +static void assigned_device_free_msix_mmio(struct kvm *kvm,
> > + struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *adev)
> > +{
> > + struct kvm_msix_mmio mmio;
> > +
> > + mmio.dev_id = adev->assigned_dev_id;
> > + mmio.type = KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_ASSIGNED_DEV |
> > + KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_BASE_TABLE;
> > + kvm_free_msix_mmio(kvm, &mmio);
> > +}
> > +
> >
> > static void kvm_free_assigned_device(struct kvm *kvm,
> >
> > struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel
> > *assigned_dev)
> >
> > {
> >
> > kvm_free_assigned_irq(kvm, assigned_dev);
> >
> > + assigned_device_free_msix_mmio(kvm, assigned_dev);
> > +
> >
> > __pci_reset_function(assigned_dev->dev);
> > pci_restore_state(assigned_dev->dev);
> >
> > @@ -785,3 +799,33 @@ out:
> > return r;
> >
> > }
> >
> > +int kvm_assigned_device_update_msix_mask_bit(struct kvm *kvm,
> > + int assigned_dev_id, int entry, bool mask)
> > +{
> > + int r = -EFAULT;
> > + struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *adev;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
> > + return r;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
> > + adev = kvm_find_assigned_dev(&kvm->arch.assigned_dev_head,
> > + assigned_dev_id);
> > + if (!adev)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < adev->entries_nr; i++)
> > + if (adev->host_msix_entries[i].entry == entry) {
> > + if (mask)
> > + disable_irq_nosync(
> > + adev->host_msix_entries[i].vector);
> > + else
> > + enable_irq(adev->host_msix_entries[i].vector);
> > + r = 0;
> > + break;
> > + }
>
> Should check if the host irq is registered as MSIX type.
>
> > +out:
> > + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
> > + return r;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > index b1b6cbb..b7807c8 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
> >
> > #include "coalesced_mmio.h"
> > #include "async_pf.h"
> >
> > +#include "msix_mmio.h"
> >
> > #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> > #include <trace/events/kvm.h>
> >
> > @@ -509,6 +510,7 @@ static void kvm_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> >
> > struct mm_struct *mm = kvm->mm;
> >
> > kvm_arch_sync_events(kvm);
> >
> > + kvm_unregister_msix_mmio_dev(kvm);
> >
> > spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
> > list_del(&kvm->vm_list);
> > spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
> >
> > @@ -1877,6 +1879,24 @@ static long kvm_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> >
> > mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
> > break;
> >
> > #endif
> >
> > + case KVM_REGISTER_MSIX_MMIO: {
> > + struct kvm_msix_mmio_user mmio_user;
> > +
> > + r = -EFAULT;
> > + if (copy_from_user(&mmio_user, argp, sizeof mmio_user))
> > + goto out;
> > + r = kvm_vm_ioctl_register_msix_mmio(kvm, &mmio_user);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + case KVM_UNREGISTER_MSIX_MMIO: {
> > + struct kvm_msix_mmio_user mmio_user;
> > +
> > + r = -EFAULT;
> > + if (copy_from_user(&mmio_user, argp, sizeof mmio_user))
> > + goto out;
> > + r = kvm_vm_ioctl_unregister_msix_mmio(kvm, &mmio_user);
> > + break;
> > + }
> >
> > default:
> > r = kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(filp, ioctl, arg);
> > if (r == -ENOTTY)
> >
> > @@ -1988,6 +2008,12 @@ static int kvm_dev_ioctl_create_vm(void)
> >
> > return r;
> >
> > }
> >
> > #endif
> >
> > + r = kvm_register_msix_mmio_dev(kvm);
> > + if (r < 0) {
> > + kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
> > + return r;
> > + }
> > +
> >
> > r = anon_inode_getfd("kvm-vm", &kvm_vm_fops, kvm, O_RDWR);
> > if (r < 0)
> >
> > kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
> >
> > @@ -2223,14 +2249,18 @@ static void kvm_io_bus_destroy(struct kvm_io_bus
> > *bus)
> >
> > int kvm_io_bus_write(struct kvm *kvm, enum kvm_bus bus_idx, gpa_t addr,
> >
> > int len, const void *val)
> >
> > {
> >
> > - int i;
> > + int i, r = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >
> > struct kvm_io_bus *bus;
> >
> > bus = srcu_dereference(kvm->buses[bus_idx], &kvm->srcu);
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < bus->dev_count; i++)
> > - if (!kvm_iodevice_write(bus->devs[i], addr, len, val))
> > + for (i = 0; i < bus->dev_count; i++) {
> > + r = kvm_iodevice_write(bus->devs[i], addr, len, val);
> > + if (r == -ENOTSYNC)
> > + break;
> > + else if (!r)
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + }
> > + return r;
> >
> > }
> >
> > /* kvm_io_bus_read - called under kvm->slots_lock */
> >
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/msix_mmio.c b/virt/kvm/msix_mmio.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..dc6e8ca
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/msix_mmio.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,284 @@
> > +/*
> > + * MSI-X MMIO emulation
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2010 Intel Corporation
> > + *
> > + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2. See
> > + * the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> > + *
> > + * Author:
> > + * Sheng Yang <sheng.yang@intel.com>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> > +#include <linux/kvm.h>
> > +
> > +#include "msix_mmio.h"
> > +#include "iodev.h"
> > +
> > +static int update_msix_mask_bit(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msix_mmio
> > *mmio, + int entry, u32 flag)
> > +{
> > + if (mmio->type & KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_ASSIGNED_DEV)
> > + return kvm_assigned_device_update_msix_mask_bit(kvm,
> > + mmio->dev_id, entry, flag);
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Caller must hold dev->lock */
> > +static int get_mmio_table_index(struct kvm_msix_mmio_dev *dev,
> > + gpa_t addr, int len)
> > +{
> > + gpa_t start, end;
> > + int i, r = -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < dev->mmio_nr; i++) {
> > + start = dev->mmio[i].table_base_addr;
> > + end = dev->mmio[i].table_base_addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE *
> > + dev->mmio[i].max_entries_nr;
> > + if (addr >= start && addr + len <= end) {
> > + r = i;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return r;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int msix_table_mmio_read(struct kvm_io_device *this, gpa_t addr,
> > int len, + void *val)
> > +{
> > + struct kvm_msix_mmio_dev *mmio_dev =
> > + container_of(this, struct kvm_msix_mmio_dev, table_dev);
> > + struct kvm_msix_mmio *mmio;
> > + int idx, ret = 0, entry, offset, r;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&mmio_dev->lock);
> > + idx = get_mmio_table_index(mmio_dev, addr, len);
> > + if (idx < 0) {
> > + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + if ((addr & 0x3) || (len != 4 && len != 8))
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + offset = addr & 0xf;
> > + if (offset == PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL && len == 8)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + mmio = &mmio_dev->mmio[idx];
> > + entry = (addr - mmio->table_base_addr) / PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE;
> > + r = copy_from_user(val, (void __user *)(mmio->table_base_va +
> > + entry * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE + offset), len);
> > + if (r)
> > + goto out;
> > +out:
> > + mutex_unlock(&mmio_dev->lock);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int msix_table_mmio_write(struct kvm_io_device *this, gpa_t addr,
> > + int len, const void *val)
> > +{
> > + struct kvm_msix_mmio_dev *mmio_dev =
> > + container_of(this, struct kvm_msix_mmio_dev, table_dev);
> > + struct kvm_msix_mmio *mmio;
> > + int idx, entry, offset, ret = 0, r = 0;
> > + gpa_t entry_base;
> > + u32 old_ctrl, new_ctrl;
> > + u32 *ctrl_pos;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&mmio_dev->lock);
> > + idx = get_mmio_table_index(mmio_dev, addr, len);
> > + if (idx < 0) {
> > + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + if ((addr & 0x3) || (len != 4 && len != 8))
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + offset = addr & 0xF;
> > + if (offset == PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL && len == 8)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + mmio = &mmio_dev->mmio[idx];
> > + entry = (addr - mmio->table_base_addr) / PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE;
> > + entry_base = mmio->table_base_va + entry * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE;
> > + ctrl_pos = (u32 *)(entry_base + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL);
> > +
> > + if (get_user(old_ctrl, ctrl_pos))
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + /* No allow writing to other fields when entry is unmasked */
> > + if (!(old_ctrl & PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT) &&
> > + offset != PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)(entry_base + offset), val, len))
> > + goto out;
>
> Instead of copying to/from userspace (which is subject to swapin,
> unexpected values), you could include the guest written value in a
> kvm_run structure, along with address. Qemu-kvm would use that to
> synchronize its copy of the table, on KVM_EXIT_MSIX_ROUTING_UPDATE exit.
We want to acelerate MSI-X mask bit accessing, which won't exit to userspace in
the most condition. That's the cost we want to optimize. Also it's possible to
userspace to read the correct value of MMIO(but mostly userspace can't write to it
in order to prevent synchronize issue).
>
> > +
> > + if (get_user(new_ctrl, ctrl_pos))
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + if ((offset < PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL && len == 4) ||
> > + (offset < PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_DATA && len == 8))
> > + ret = -ENOTSYNC;
> > + if (old_ctrl == new_ctrl)
> > + goto out;
> > + if (!(old_ctrl & PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT) &&
> > + (new_ctrl & PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT))
> > + r = update_msix_mask_bit(mmio_dev->kvm, mmio, entry, 1);
> > + else if ((old_ctrl & PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT) &&
> > + !(new_ctrl & PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT))
> > + r = update_msix_mask_bit(mmio_dev->kvm, mmio, entry, 0);
>
> Then you rely on the kernel copy of the values to enable/disable irq.
Yes, they are guest owned assigned IRQs. Any potential issue?
>
> > + if (r || ret)
> > + ret = -ENOTSYNC;
> > +out:
> > + mutex_unlock(&mmio_dev->lock);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct kvm_io_device_ops msix_mmio_table_ops = {
> > + .read = msix_table_mmio_read,
> > + .write = msix_table_mmio_write,
> > +};
> > +
> > +int kvm_register_msix_mmio_dev(struct kvm *kvm)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + kvm_iodevice_init(&kvm->msix_mmio_dev.table_dev, &msix_mmio_table_ops);
> > + mutex_init(&kvm->msix_mmio_dev.lock);
> > + kvm->msix_mmio_dev.kvm = kvm;
> > + mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> > + ret = kvm_io_bus_register_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS,
> > + &kvm->msix_mmio_dev.table_dev);
> > + mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int kvm_unregister_msix_mmio_dev(struct kvm *kvm)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> > + ret = kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS,
> > + &kvm->msix_mmio_dev.table_dev);
> > + mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int kvm_vm_ioctl_register_msix_mmio(struct kvm *kvm,
> > + struct kvm_msix_mmio_user *mmio_user)
> > +{
> > + struct kvm_msix_mmio_dev *mmio_dev = &kvm->msix_mmio_dev;
> > + struct kvm_msix_mmio *mmio = NULL;
> > + int r = 0, i;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&mmio_dev->lock);
> > + for (i = 0; i < mmio_dev->mmio_nr; i++) {
> > + if (mmio_dev->mmio[i].dev_id == mmio_user->dev_id &&
> > + (mmio_dev->mmio[i].type & KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_DEV_MASK) ==
> > + (mmio_user->type & KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_DEV_MASK)) {
> > + mmio = &mmio_dev->mmio[i];
> > + if (mmio->max_entries_nr != mmio_user->max_entries_nr) {
> > + r = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + if (mmio_user->max_entries_nr > KVM_MAX_MSIX_PER_DEV) {
> > + r = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + /* All reserved currently */
> > + if (mmio_user->flags) {
> > + r = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if ((mmio_user->type & KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_DEV_MASK) !=
> > + KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_ASSIGNED_DEV) {
> > + r = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + if ((mmio_user->type & KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_BASE_MASK) !=
> > + KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_BASE_TABLE) {
> > + r = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, mmio_user->base_va,
> > + mmio_user->max_entries_nr * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE)) {
> > + r = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + if (!mmio) {
> > + if (mmio_dev->mmio_nr == KVM_MSIX_MMIO_MAX) {
> > + r = -ENOSPC;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + mmio = &mmio_dev->mmio[mmio_dev->mmio_nr];
> > + }
> > +
> > + mmio_dev->mmio_nr++;
> > + mmio->max_entries_nr = mmio_user->max_entries_nr;
> > + mmio->dev_id = mmio_user->dev_id;
> > + mmio->flags = mmio_user->flags;
> > +
> > + if ((mmio_user->type & KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_DEV_MASK) ==
> > + KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_ASSIGNED_DEV)
> > + mmio->type = KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_ASSIGNED_DEV;
> > + if ((mmio_user->type & KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_BASE_MASK) ==
> > + KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_BASE_TABLE) {
> > + mmio->type |= KVM_MSIX_MMIO_TYPE_BASE_TABLE;
> > + mmio->table_base_addr = mmio_user->base_addr;
> > + mmio->table_base_va = mmio_user->base_va;
> > + }
> > +out:
> > + mutex_unlock(&mmio_dev->lock);
> > + return r;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int kvm_free_msix_mmio(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msix_mmio *mmio)
> > +{
> > + struct kvm_msix_mmio_dev *mmio_dev = &kvm->msix_mmio_dev;
> > + int r = 0, i, j;
> > + bool found = 0;
> > +
> > + if (!mmio)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&mmio_dev->lock);
> > + BUG_ON(mmio_dev->mmio_nr >= KVM_MSIX_MMIO_MAX);
>
> Its valid for mmio_nr to be equal to KVM_MSIX_MMIO_MAX.
>
> > + for (i = 0; i < mmio_dev->mmio_nr; i++) {
> > + if (mmio_dev->mmio[i].dev_id == mmio->dev_id &&
> > + mmio_dev->mmio[i].type == mmio->type) {
> > + found = true;
> > + for (j = i; j < mmio_dev->mmio_nr - 1; j++)
> > + mmio_dev->mmio[j] = mmio_dev->mmio[j + 1];
> > + mmio_dev->mmio[mmio_dev->mmio_nr].max_entries_nr = 0;
> > + mmio_dev->mmio[mmio_dev->mmio_nr].dev_id = 0;
> > + mmio_dev->mmio[mmio_dev->mmio_nr].type = 0;
> > + mmio_dev->mmio_nr--;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + if (!found)
> > + r = -EINVAL;
> > + mutex_unlock(&mmio_dev->lock);
> > + return r;
> > +}
>
> This is not consistent with registration, where there are no checks
> regarding validity of assigned device id. So why is it necessary?
I am not quite understand. We need to free mmio anyway, otherwise it would result
in wrong mmio interception...
>
> There is a lock ordering problem BTW:
>
> - read/write handlers: dev->lock -> kvm->lock
> - vm_ioctl_deassign_device -> kvm_free_msix_mmio: kvm->lock -> dev->lock
Good catch! Would fix it(and other comments of course).
--
regards
Yang, Sheng
>
> > +
> > +int kvm_vm_ioctl_unregister_msix_mmio(struct kvm *kvm,
> > + struct kvm_msix_mmio_user *mmio_user)
> > +{
> > + struct kvm_msix_mmio mmio;
> > +
> > + mmio.dev_id = mmio_user->dev_id;
> > + mmio.type = mmio_user->type;
> > +
> > + return kvm_free_msix_mmio(kvm, &mmio);
> > +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-17 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-06 10:19 [PATCH 0/3 v7] MSI-X MMIO support for KVM Sheng Yang
2011-01-06 10:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: Move struct kvm_io_device to kvm_host.h Sheng Yang
2011-01-06 10:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: Emulate MSI-X table in kernel Sheng Yang
2011-01-17 11:54 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-17 12:18 ` Sheng Yang [this message]
2011-01-17 12:18 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-17 12:48 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-17 12:51 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-17 15:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-17 16:01 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-17 12:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-19 8:37 ` Sheng Yang
2011-01-17 12:29 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-17 13:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-17 13:47 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-30 4:38 ` Sheng Yang
2011-01-31 13:09 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-01 4:21 ` Sheng Yang
2011-01-06 10:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: Add documents for MSI-X MMIO API Sheng Yang
2011-01-17 12:21 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-17 12:35 ` Sheng Yang
2011-01-17 12:45 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-19 8:21 ` Sheng Yang
2011-01-25 12:47 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-26 9:05 ` Sheng Yang
2011-01-31 13:24 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-01 4:26 ` Sheng Yang
2011-01-12 2:23 ` [PATCH 0/3 v7] MSI-X MMIO support for KVM Sheng Yang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-30 5:11 [PATCH 0/3 v8] " Sheng Yang
2011-01-30 5:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: Emulate MSI-X table in kernel Sheng Yang
2011-02-03 1:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-02-18 8:15 ` Sheng Yang
2011-02-22 17:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-02-23 0:19 ` Alex Williamson
2011-02-23 6:59 ` Sheng Yang
2011-02-23 8:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-02-24 8:08 ` Sheng Yang
2011-02-24 10:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-02-25 5:54 ` Sheng Yang
2011-02-24 9:44 ` Sheng Yang
2011-02-24 10:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-02-25 6:12 ` Sheng Yang
2011-02-25 8:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-02-23 16:34 ` Alex Williamson
2011-02-23 18:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-02-23 19:02 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201101172018.22478.sheng@linux.intel.com \
--to=sheng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.