From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: bhutchings@solarflare.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com, therbert@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/5] genirq: Add IRQ affinity notifiers
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:27:30 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110119.132730.57462002.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1101192214350.3211@localhost6.localdomain6>
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:19:04 +0100 (CET)
> B1;2401;0cOn Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
>> When initiating I/O on a multiqueue and multi-IRQ device, we may want
>> to select a queue for which the response will be handled on the same
>> or a nearby CPU. This requires a reverse-map of IRQ affinity. Add a
>> notification mechanism to support this.
>>
>> This is based closely on work by Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
>> ---
>> Thomas, I hope this answers all your comments. If you are happy with
>> this, can it go into net-next-2.6 so the rest of this series can get
>> into 2.6.39?
>
> Looks good, but I prefer to take it via the tip/genirq branch as I
> have other changes pending to that code. I'll put this into a separate
> branch based on rc1 as a single commit so Dave can pull that branch
> into netdev. Dave ?
But if you do that what happens down the line when Linus pulls our trees
in?
If he takes your tip/genirq first, I have merge hassles to deal with.
If he takes the -rc1 relative version I end up with, you'll have the
merge hassles.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-19 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-19 20:59 [PATCH net-next-2.6 0/5] RFS hardware acceleration (v3) Ben Hutchings
2011-01-19 21:01 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/5] genirq: Add IRQ affinity notifiers Ben Hutchings
2011-01-19 21:02 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-01-19 21:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-01-19 21:27 ` David Miller [this message]
2011-01-19 21:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-01-19 21:48 ` David Miller
2011-01-19 21:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-01-22 16:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-07 20:44 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-01-22 16:37 ` [tip:irq/numa] " tip-bot for Ben Hutchings
2011-01-24 23:01 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/5] " David Miller
2011-01-19 21:03 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 2/5] lib: cpu_rmap: CPU affinity reverse-mapping Ben Hutchings
2011-01-24 23:01 ` David Miller
2011-01-19 21:03 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 3/5] net: RPS: Enable hardware acceleration of RFS Ben Hutchings
2011-01-24 23:01 ` David Miller
2011-01-19 21:06 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 4/5] sfc: Limit filter search depth further for performance hints (i.e. RFS) Ben Hutchings
2011-01-24 23:02 ` David Miller
2011-01-19 21:06 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 5/5] sfc: Implement hardware acceleration of RFS Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110119.132730.57462002.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.