From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: poky@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] util-linux: split out libuuid and libblkid into separate packages
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:15:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201101201015.03665.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D3737DF.2040906@intel.com>
On Wednesday 19 January 2011 19:13:35 Saul Wold wrote:
> On 01/19/2011 08:55 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > libuuid and libblkid can exist on their own separately from the rest
> > of util-linux. Slightly reduces the overall footprint of other packages
> > that depend on these libraries.
>
> Is this different than the work that Qing submitted last night? Are you
> both addressing the same bug #661?
>
> This fix seems different than his, we need to make sure we are better
> coordinated
Yes, this is a lesson for me to check bugzilla and pay closer attention
patches that are being posted - my apologies. FYI I was responding to a
request from Richard on IRC rather than the bug report.
Qing's patch is slightly better than mine in that it splits the dev packages
out as well; on the other hand it names the packages libuuid and libblkid
rather than util-linux-libblkid and util-linux-libuuid. Personally it doesn't
bother me, but having the prefix there does at least make it easy to determine
the source recipe from the package name.
I think we do also need to bump PR on all packages that depend on these
libraries (the other patches from my patchset) so that package dependencies
get corrected automatically.
Qing, would you mind integrating these changes into your branch and reposting?
(assuming we want the util-linux- package name prefix?)
Cheers,
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-20 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-19 16:55 [PATCH 0/3] util-linux: split out libuuid and libblkid Paul Eggleton
2011-01-19 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] util-linux: split out libuuid and libblkid into separate packages Paul Eggleton
2011-01-19 19:13 ` Saul Wold
2011-01-20 10:15 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2011-01-21 3:15 ` Qing He
2011-01-19 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] gst-plugins-base: add util-linux to DEPENDS Paul Eggleton
2011-01-19 16:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] Bump PR on recipes that depend on util-linux Paul Eggleton
2011-01-19 19:51 ` [PATCH 0/3] util-linux: split out libuuid and libblkid Koen Kooi
2011-01-19 20:03 ` Mark Hatle
2011-01-19 21:24 ` Richard Purdie
2011-01-19 21:33 ` Mark Hatle
2011-01-19 21:50 ` Richard Purdie
2011-01-21 3:33 ` Qing He
2011-01-19 20:05 ` Bruce Ashfield
2011-01-19 20:06 ` Richard Purdie
2011-01-21 3:24 ` Qing He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201101201015.03665.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=poky@yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.