From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>, Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: flex_array related problems on selinux policy loading
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:26:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110120122659.GD4639@secunet.com> (raw)
Some recent changes to use flex_array_alloc on selinux policy loading made
me unable load my selinux policy. I'm not using 'common' and 'bool' in the
policy, this leads to some zero size allocations in policydb_index().
Unfortunately the behaviour on zero size allocations of flex_array_alloc()
is not the same as of kmalloc(). While zero size allocations are legal on
kmalloc(), flex_array_prealloc() fails with -ENOSPC if total_nr_elements
is zero (this happens if I try to load my policy) or it hits a division by
zero if element_size is zero.
The patch below changes the flex_array_alloc behaviour on zero size allocations
to be the same as with kmalloc. I'm able to load my policy with the patch
and everything seems to work fine. However, flex_array_get() returns now NULL
if the pointer to the struct flex_array is a ZERO_SIZE_PTR. There is a lot
of BUG_ON() in the policy handling code if flex_array_get() returns NULL, so
somebody with a deeper knowledge on selinux policy handling should look into
this to see if furter changes are necessary.
Steffen
Subject: [PATCH] flex_array: Change behaviour on zero size allocations
flex_array_alloc allocates the basic struct flex_array regardless whether
total_nr_elements or element_size is zero. Then flex_array_prealloc
fails with -ENOSPC if total_nr_elements is zero or it hits a division by
zero if element_size is zero.
This patch changes the behaviour on zero size allocations to the same
as kmalloc, we return ZERO_SIZE_PTR in this case. All flex_array handlers
test for ZERO_SIZE_PTR and return an appropriate value to the caller.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
---
lib/flex_array.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/flex_array.c b/lib/flex_array.c
index c0ea40b..420d11d 100644
--- a/lib/flex_array.c
+++ b/lib/flex_array.c
@@ -88,8 +88,13 @@ struct flex_array *flex_array_alloc(int element_size, unsigned int total,
gfp_t flags)
{
struct flex_array *ret;
- int max_size = FLEX_ARRAY_NR_BASE_PTRS *
- FLEX_ARRAY_ELEMENTS_PER_PART(element_size);
+ int max_size;
+
+ if (unlikely(!element_size || !total))
+ return ZERO_SIZE_PTR;
+
+ max_size = FLEX_ARRAY_NR_BASE_PTRS *
+ FLEX_ARRAY_ELEMENTS_PER_PART(element_size);
/* max_size will end up 0 if element_size > PAGE_SIZE */
if (total > max_size)
@@ -123,6 +128,9 @@ void flex_array_free_parts(struct flex_array *fa)
{
int part_nr;
+ if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(fa)))
+ return;
+
if (elements_fit_in_base(fa))
return;
for (part_nr = 0; part_nr < FLEX_ARRAY_NR_BASE_PTRS; part_nr++)
@@ -187,6 +195,9 @@ int flex_array_put(struct flex_array *fa, unsigned int element_nr, void *src,
struct flex_array_part *part;
void *dst;
+ if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(fa)))
+ return 0;
+
if (element_nr >= fa->total_nr_elements)
return -ENOSPC;
if (elements_fit_in_base(fa))
@@ -215,6 +226,9 @@ int flex_array_clear(struct flex_array *fa, unsigned int element_nr)
struct flex_array_part *part;
void *dst;
+ if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(fa)))
+ return 0;
+
if (element_nr >= fa->total_nr_elements)
return -ENOSPC;
if (elements_fit_in_base(fa))
@@ -252,6 +266,9 @@ int flex_array_prealloc(struct flex_array *fa, unsigned int start,
int part_nr;
struct flex_array_part *part;
+ if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(fa)))
+ return 0;
+
if (start >= fa->total_nr_elements || end >= fa->total_nr_elements)
return -ENOSPC;
if (elements_fit_in_base(fa))
@@ -284,6 +301,9 @@ void *flex_array_get(struct flex_array *fa, unsigned int element_nr)
int part_nr = fa_element_to_part_nr(fa, element_nr);
struct flex_array_part *part;
+ if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(fa)))
+ return NULL;
+
if (element_nr >= fa->total_nr_elements)
return NULL;
if (elements_fit_in_base(fa))
@@ -343,6 +363,9 @@ int flex_array_shrink(struct flex_array *fa)
int part_nr;
int ret = 0;
+ if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(fa)))
+ return 0;
+
if (elements_fit_in_base(fa))
return ret;
for (part_nr = 0; part_nr < FLEX_ARRAY_NR_BASE_PTRS; part_nr++) {
--
1.7.0.4
next reply other threads:[~2011-01-20 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-20 12:26 Steffen Klassert [this message]
2011-01-20 15:28 ` flex_array related problems on selinux policy loading Dave Hansen
2011-01-21 7:20 ` Steffen Klassert
2011-01-21 15:57 ` Dave Hansen
2011-01-26 10:23 ` Steffen Klassert
2011-01-26 16:10 ` Dave Hansen
2011-01-27 12:15 ` Steffen Klassert
2011-01-31 8:08 ` Steffen Klassert
2011-01-26 13:04 ` Steffen Klassert
2011-01-26 16:15 ` Dave Hansen
2011-01-27 12:46 ` Steffen Klassert
2011-01-27 16:57 ` Dave Hansen
2011-01-31 8:00 ` Steffen Klassert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110120122659.GD4639@secunet.com \
--to=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.