From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luis R. Rodriguez Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:49:34 -0800 Subject: [ath9k-devel] Should we remove all the virtual wiphy code from ath9k? In-Reply-To: <4D387E75.8000006@candelatech.com> References: <4D387E75.8000006@candelatech.com> Message-ID: <20110120184934.GE10554@tux> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:27:01AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote: > Seems I saw a note a long time ago about virtual wiphy being > removed sometime soon. Should we go ahead and remove it? > > It doesn't seem useful to me (virtual interfaces appear to > work much better), and it would likely simplify the code > a bit to have it gone. As much as I love the funcitonality it complicates the driver, and I would welcome the rm -rf of it given that experimenters can simply use older kernels now with the virtual wiphy. Jouni, thoughts? Luis