From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:58891 "EHLO
	mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751967Ab1ATScC (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:32:02 -0500
Received: by wyb28 with SMTP id 28so916513wyb.19
        for <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:32:01 -0800 (PST)
From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
To: Helge Lenz <helge.lenz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: carl9170 802.11n-AP
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:31:52 +0100
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
References: <4D380E46.6070906@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D380E46.6070906@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Message-Id: <201101201931.52933.chunkeey@googlemail.com>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On Thursday 20 January 2011 11:28:22 Helge Lenz wrote:

> Any news about this issue?
no news, unless you have news about a new generation of ar9170 chip.
The current one has serve problems with 802.11e - which has become
mandatory for 802.11n - and aggregation. So going for full 802.11n
support [including AP] is sort of pointless...

If you are looking for a 802.11n AP, so why not start with one?

Best Regards,
	Chr