From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: greg@kroah.com (Greg KH)
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:54:18 -0800
Subject: [stable] [PATCH] ARM: SMDK6410: Fix build with WM1190 disabled
	and WM1192 enabled
In-Reply-To: <20110121194656.GB3075@sirena.org.uk>
References: <1295630829-13812-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
	<20110121191507.GA16210@kroah.com>
	<20110121194656.GB3075@sirena.org.uk>
Message-ID: <20110121195418.GA18700@kroah.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 07:46:56PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:15:07AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 05:27:09PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
> 
> > Why is this a -stable patch?  Is the build broken somehow right now in a
> > released kernel without this patch?
> 
> I believe the build breakage affects existing released kernels with the
> appropriate set of configuration options chosen (1192 enabled and 1190
> disabled), yes.  This is a pretty obscure combination so it's unlikely
> anyone will run into it in practice.

Ok, then it probably shouldn't be a -stable patch :)

thanks,

greg k-h