From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753359Ab1AXPvm (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:51:42 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:51543 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753281Ab1AXPvk (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:51:40 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=rfTeeTUlmw59rZCd6aGQEbxz/TbDYtesmyZYCv7Sa/X4OQWNKv/yEJ0nqyyVnSwmj4 paq4bOYAzvjqBIojr7ndGjcTmCzph12Ei1RTiGG/hHrQ4X8ATA3yyuaus9wd+N5978ge UOxJyEFh4ZUi1Vr6lcb11us7WCwjadsdd1l8w= Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:51:33 +0100 From: Tejun Heo To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Ryan Wilson , Jan Beulich , Jesse Barnes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-pcifront: don't use flush_scheduled_work() Message-ID: <20110124155133.GA27510@htj.dyndns.org> References: <20110124144303.GG11404@htj.dyndns.org> <20110124153958.GA1222@dumpdata.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110124153958.GA1222@dumpdata.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:39:58AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 03:43:03PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: > > flush_scheduled_work() is scheduled for deprecation. Cancel ->op_work > > 2.6.39 or 2.6.40? Not seeing it referenced in > feature-removal-schedule.txt file? There now are only a handful of users left. I'm currently sending out patches for them. Once they appear on linux-next, I'll mark flush_scheduled_work() deprecated and add it to feature-removal in the workqueue tree and push it to linux-next. So, yeah, it's likely to be marked deprecated in 2.6.39. Thanks. -- tejun