diff for duplicates of <20110124202610.GJ29925@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index b856545..b211148 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ However... > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Mark Brown > > So you actively need to push the processor into low power mode during -> > suspend? ?I'm still not 100% clear what's triggering the issues you're +> > suspend? I'm still not 100% clear what's triggering the issues you're > It's more of a voltage scaling issue than a cpufreq issue directly. > Tegra requires the voltage be set to nominal during resume, and the @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ but I think it's a generic-ish problem. See below. > > they're active by the time I2C is off they normally get suspended by > > hardware handshakes from the CPU as that enters low power mode - right > > now we have no regulators at all in mainline that do anything in -> > software on suspend. ?We can get a long way by just ignoring what +> > software on suspend. We can get a long way by just ignoring what > > happens to regulators over suspend (there is some work to do here but > > it's orthogonal to this sort of issue). diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 849a499..d9ad79f 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -4,10 +4,16 @@ "ref\0AANLkTikrUdLM8VmW5yCndf927E=drZF1gGBwXq6Dj5mW@mail.gmail.com\0" "ref\020110124193539.GI29925@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com\0" "ref\0AANLkTikOEm=watbA1G-SFK3PZrntDc+Wun84nGio=YKv@mail.gmail.com\0" - "From\0broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH v2 20/28] ARM: tegra: cpufreq: Disable cpufreq during suspend\0" + "From\0Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 20/28] ARM: tegra: cpufreq: Disable cpufreq during suspend\0" "Date\0Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:26:10 +0000\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>\0" + "Cc\0linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" + Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> + konkers@android.com + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + olof@lixom.net + " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:52:12AM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:\n" @@ -23,7 +29,7 @@ "> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Mark Brown\n" "\n" "> > So you actively need to push the processor into low power mode during\n" - "> > suspend? ?I'm still not 100% clear what's triggering the issues you're\n" + "> > suspend? \302\240I'm still not 100% clear what's triggering the issues you're\n" "\n" "> It's more of a voltage scaling issue than a cpufreq issue directly.\n" "> Tegra requires the voltage be set to nominal during resume, and the\n" @@ -39,7 +45,7 @@ "> > they're active by the time I2C is off they normally get suspended by\n" "> > hardware handshakes from the CPU as that enters low power mode - right\n" "> > now we have no regulators at all in mainline that do anything in\n" - "> > software on suspend. ?We can get a long way by just ignoring what\n" + "> > software on suspend. \302\240We can get a long way by just ignoring what\n" "> > happens to regulators over suspend (there is some work to do here but\n" "> > it's orthogonal to this sort of issue).\n" "\n" @@ -66,4 +72,4 @@ "this stuff and it's common to refer to other implementations so it'd be\n" nice if we had a clear record of the issue in the log. -aef1cf80b67857bf7d09a51e56c8019000bdf56aa35d7a43404f6441b9830f04 +9230d891db7d2de5d6cfaf7db3cae80019d1eaa3858b0b966091fcebd6f39df9
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.