From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
To: "Lu, Lianhao" <lianhao.lu@intel.com>
Cc: "poky@yoctoproject.org" <poky@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: Is the grammar of .la files changed in new libtool 2.4?
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:43:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110126064355.GA31479@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C10D3FB0CD45994C8A51FEC1227CE22F20A8339044@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On (26/01/11 13:56), Lu, Lianhao wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> I'm wondering whether the grammar of the .la files generated by new libtool 2.4 is different from the old ones. Take the file libxcb-res.la generated by libxcb for example, it contains a line:
>
> dependency_libs=' =/usr/lib/libxcb.la =/usr/lib/libXau.la'
>
> While in the old libxcb.la file, this line appeared to be
>
> dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libxcb.la /usr/lib/libxcb.la'
>
> Is the "=" a new grammar for liblool 2.4?
yes its new and it means that sysroot will be prepended to this when
resolving
Because in meta-toolchain, it needs to fix these .la files by replacing all the "/usr/lib" to "${SDKTARGETSYSROOT}/usr/lib", etc. This new "=" causes the original regular expression not work.
>
> b.t.w. Do we still need the code in meta-toolchain to fix broken .la files? According to my understanding, the new sysroot support in libtool 2.4 should solve this problem, right? Thanks!
>
> Best Regards,
> - Lianhao Lu
> _______________________________________________
> poky mailing list
> poky@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/poky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-26 6:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-26 5:56 Is the grammar of .la files changed in new libtool 2.4? Lu, Lianhao
2011-01-26 6:18 ` Scott Garman
2011-01-26 6:39 ` Lu, Lianhao
2011-01-26 9:42 ` Richard Purdie
2011-01-26 6:43 ` Khem Raj [this message]
2011-01-26 9:40 ` Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110126064355.GA31479@gmail.com \
--to=raj.khem@gmail.com \
--cc=lianhao.lu@intel.com \
--cc=poky@yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.