All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
	Abhijeet Kolekar <abhijeet.kolekar@intel.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] iwl3945: remove check_plcp_health
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:15:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110126071534.GB2357@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110125151445.GA2927@tuxdriver.com>

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:14:46AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:35:28AM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > This patch helps some users currently complaining about iwl3945
> > performance.
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654599
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/+source/linux/+bug/621265/+index?comments=all
> > 
> > Patch does not helps all users, but they seems to be affected
> > by different bug or bugs.
> > 
> > Patch effectively reverts commit a29576a7844326c5223f4d4adbfd3f4d64173d4c
> > "iwl3945: add plcp error checking". It is minimal fix intended to
> > -stable posting. I will post cleaning up patch, if fix will be accepted.
> > 
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c |    1 -
> >  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c
> > index 8cacb4e..eb916d7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c
> > @@ -2832,7 +2832,6 @@ static struct iwl_lib_ops iwl3945_lib = {
> >  	.config_ap = iwl3945_config_ap,
> >  	.manage_ibss_station = iwl3945_manage_ibss_station,
> >  	.recover_from_tx_stall = iwl_bg_monitor_recover,
> > -	.check_plcp_health = iwl3945_good_plcp_health,
> >  
> >  	.debugfs_ops = {
> >  		.rx_stats_read = iwl3945_ucode_rx_stats_read,
> 
> Did you experiment with different values for
> IWL_MAX_PLCP_ERR_LONG_THRESHOLD_DEF for iwl3945?

No, I'm not able to reproduce the problem. I will request that
via bugzilla to users hitting bug.

> Should we simply revert commit a29576a7844326c5223f4d4adbfd3f4d64173d4c
> instead?

Due to massive other automatic revert fails on upstream code, also
it would be relatively hard to backport. So I decided to do oneliner
fix for stable, and clean up (revert all not necessary code) only
upstream separately.

Cheers
Stanislaw

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-26  7:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-25  9:35 [RFC] iwl3945: remove check_plcp_health Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-01-25 14:56 ` wwguy
2011-01-25 15:14 ` John W. Linville
2011-01-26  7:15   ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2011-02-08  7:35   ` Stanislaw Gruszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110126071534.GB2357@redhat.com \
    --to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=abhijeet.kolekar@intel.com \
    --cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.