From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54115 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiV4L-00059n-8s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:51:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiV4K-0007D1-2O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:51:37 -0500 Received: from hobi.com ([161.58.203.140]:35340) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiV4J-0007Cq-V0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:51:36 -0500 Received: from rick.localnet (adsl-99-40-178-1.dsl.emhril.sbcglobal.net [99.40.178.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by hobi.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0RGpWjr015780 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:51:35 GMT From: Rick Vernam Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:51:32 -0600 References: <4D412CF0.30706@redhat.com> <4D419DB6.6000707@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4D419DB6.6000707@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201101271051.32749.rickv@hobi.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PING 0.14] seabios virtio bug Reply-To: rickv@hobi.com List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > > Please reply to this message with a subject starting with "[PING 0.14]" > > and a link to patchwork, gmane, or whatnot; or "[PULL 0.14]" for tree > > pulls. Also, I believe all patches meant for stable should also start > > having "[PATCH 0.14]", too. I'm not sure how to tell which version of seabios is shipped with qemu. What I am sure about is that the version that shipped with qemu 0.13 had a bug as described here http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-09/msg01145.html The patch to seabios that fixed the bug was released with seabios-0.6.1, though I'm not sure if it was back-ported. http://www.seabios.org/pipermail/seabios/2010-September/000909.html