From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Xen watchdog patch disposition?
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:50:03 -0500
Message-ID: <20110127145003.GB3282@dumpdata.com>
References: <4D41783B020000780002EC64@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D41783B020000780002EC64@vpn.id2.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:50:51PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Jeremy,
> 
> while originally I had hoped this patch, sitting in xen/next, would get
> pushed for .37, that didn't happen and now the .38 merge window
> was missed too. Trying to get this to Linux on my own seems
> inappropriate, so can I hope that you will include this with whatever

Why would it be inappropiate? It looks as if the maintainer
for the watchdog subsystems is linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org 

Are they not responding to the patch?

> other changes you intend to push for .39?
> 
> Thanks, Jan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel