From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: Xen watchdog patch disposition? Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:40:46 -0500 Message-ID: <20110127154046.GD3282@dumpdata.com> References: <4D41783B020000780002EC64@vpn.id2.novell.com> <20110127145003.GB3282@dumpdata.com> <4D4198B2020000780002ECE1@vpn.id2.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D4198B2020000780002ECE1@vpn.id2.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jan Beulich Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 03:09:22PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 27.01.11 at 15:50, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:50:51PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> Jeremy, > >> > >> while originally I had hoped this patch, sitting in xen/next, would get > >> pushed for .37, that didn't happen and now the .38 merge window > >> was missed too. Trying to get this to Linux on my own seems > >> inappropriate, so can I hope that you will include this with whatever > > > > Why would it be inappropiate? It looks as if the maintainer > > for the watchdog subsystems is linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org > > > > Are they not responding to the patch? > > Indeed, that's what is(n't) happening. Grrrrrrr.. Can you repost it once more please? I don't remember it at all and I wouldn't mind taking a look at it again. If it does not bite through the linux-watchdog mailing list I can take it under my wing and try to shepard it through the process. Thank you for bringing this up - I completly forgot about the patchset.