From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman"
<ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
Oren Laadan <orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
Tej
Subject: udev in containers
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:48:27 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110128144827.GA4981@localhost> (raw)
Hi,
Now that we are allowing udev to run in containers, Daniel has
noticed that updates to sysfs uevent files will trigger a flurry
of activity in all containers on the host. While not a problem
with just a few containers, this can severaly impact performance
with hundreds or more containers.
(Daniel, would it be possible for you to get some measurements
on host and in a container versus # of active containers, with
and without udev? Do you have a otehrwise unused machien you
could try that on?)
Is there anything we can/should do about this?
Two approaches, neither sufficiently thought out yet, would be
to generalize the directory tagging currently used for
/sys/class/net, and full-fledged implementation of a device
namespace.
The directory tagging would probably only work if we can assign
multiple tags to a device, but we could for instance make
/sys/block tagged, and really no container probably needs to see
/sys/block/sda.
The device namespace would be similar, except I suspect it
would not only hide certain devices from certain namespaces,
but it would actually virtualize the device major:minor
mapping, for checkpoint/restart, so that /dev/sda could be
redirected to another device more completely than simply
fudging the nodes under /dev.
Comments? Designs? Plans?
thanks,
-serge
next reply other threads:[~2011-01-28 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-28 14:48 Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2011-01-28 20:18 ` udev in containers Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <m1pqrgvl20.fsf-+imSwln9KH6u2/kzUuoCbdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-28 20:46 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-01-28 22:11 ` Oren Laadan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110128144827.GA4981@localhost \
--to=serge.hallyn-z7wlfzj8ewms+fvcfc7uqw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dlezcano-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.