From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Project- vs. Package-Level Branching in Git
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:42:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110129194258.GE602@nibiru.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3tygt9xmn.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
* Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
> That is only if lib{a,b,c} is _internal_ dependency. In usual case
> project A might depend on library B *to be installed*, but it doesn't
> mean that source code of library B has to be in repository for project
> A. And in usual case when project A depends on library B, it relies
> on library B public stable API (its build system might check if you
> have new enough library B installed). If you depend on specific
> version of library, patched, that is your problem...
To make it more clear:
At buildtime, a _package_ (not project!) "A" requires a already built
and installed package B in some sane place where the toolchain can find it.
On deployment of package "A", it has to be made sure that package "B"
is also deployed (eg. by a dependency-handling package manager).
These are two entirely separate stages in a software's lifecycle.
Buildtime and deployment dependencies may be different (even deployment
and runtime deps may differ).
> In the case of internal dependency, where you co-develop both project
> A and library B, it makes most sense to have separate repositories for
> A and for B, and tie them up using submodules or subtree merge.
I, personally, wouldn't use submodules - too complicated. Instead have
just one tree per package(-variant) and keep these completely separate.
> > I understand that Git was designed with a specific feature set in
> > mind -- to manage Linux kernel development -- and as such isn't
> > going to satisfy everyone. But I'm having trouble figuring out how
> > to integrate it as the SCM in my projects, which aren't organized
> > any differently than any other projects I've seen.
>
> Well, you are braindamaged by your SCM ;-) ... just kidding.
>
> Take a look how LibreOffice (Go-OOo), KDE, GNOME, GNU SourceMage Linux
> distribution organize their repositories -- all of them are highly
> modular / componentized.
Well, I wouldn't say LO is really modularized, yet. (but we're
working on that ...).
cu
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/
phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weigelt@metux.de
mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme
----------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-29 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-27 19:38 Project- vs. Package-Level Branching in Git Thomas Hauk
2011-01-27 20:09 ` Andreas Ericsson
2011-01-27 20:53 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2011-01-27 23:22 ` Thomas Hauk
2011-01-28 8:30 ` Jay Soffian
2011-01-28 9:38 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-01-29 19:42 ` Enrico Weigelt [this message]
2011-01-29 23:28 ` David Aguilar
2011-01-30 19:36 ` Enrico Weigelt
2011-01-31 0:36 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-01-31 8:56 ` Enrico Weigelt
2011-01-28 16:20 ` Marc Branchaud
2011-01-28 16:39 ` in-gitvger
2011-01-28 21:43 ` Eugene Sajine
2011-01-29 19:33 ` Enrico Weigelt
2011-01-29 19:08 ` Enrico Weigelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110129194258.GE602@nibiru.local \
--to=weigelt@metux.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.