All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] flex_array: Change behaviour on zero size allocations
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:52:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110131085213.GK3070@secunet.com> (raw)

flex_array_alloc allocates the basic struct flex_array regardless whether
total_nr_elements or element_size is zero. Then flex_array_prealloc
fails with -ENOSPC if total_nr_elements is zero or it hits a division by
zero if element_size is zero.

This patch changes the behaviour on zero size allocations to the same
as kmalloc, so zero size allocations are leagal now. This fixes a
regression on selinux policy loading.

Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
---
 lib/flex_array.c |   25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/flex_array.c b/lib/flex_array.c
index c0ea40b..8eb437b 100644
--- a/lib/flex_array.c
+++ b/lib/flex_array.c
@@ -88,8 +88,11 @@ struct flex_array *flex_array_alloc(int element_size, unsigned int total,
 					gfp_t flags)
 {
 	struct flex_array *ret;
-	int max_size = FLEX_ARRAY_NR_BASE_PTRS *
-				FLEX_ARRAY_ELEMENTS_PER_PART(element_size);
+	int max_size = 0;
+
+	if (element_size)
+		max_size = FLEX_ARRAY_NR_BASE_PTRS *
+			   FLEX_ARRAY_ELEMENTS_PER_PART(element_size);
 
 	/* max_size will end up 0 if element_size > PAGE_SIZE */
 	if (total > max_size)
@@ -183,15 +186,18 @@ __fa_get_part(struct flex_array *fa, int part_nr, gfp_t flags)
 int flex_array_put(struct flex_array *fa, unsigned int element_nr, void *src,
 			gfp_t flags)
 {
-	int part_nr = fa_element_to_part_nr(fa, element_nr);
+	int part_nr;
 	struct flex_array_part *part;
 	void *dst;
 
+	if (!fa->element_size)
+		return 0;
 	if (element_nr >= fa->total_nr_elements)
 		return -ENOSPC;
 	if (elements_fit_in_base(fa))
 		part = (struct flex_array_part *)&fa->parts[0];
 	else {
+		part_nr = fa_element_to_part_nr(fa, element_nr);
 		part = __fa_get_part(fa, part_nr, flags);
 		if (!part)
 			return -ENOMEM;
@@ -211,15 +217,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(flex_array_put);
  */
 int flex_array_clear(struct flex_array *fa, unsigned int element_nr)
 {
-	int part_nr = fa_element_to_part_nr(fa, element_nr);
+	int part_nr;
 	struct flex_array_part *part;
 	void *dst;
 
+	if (!fa->element_size)
+		return 0;
 	if (element_nr >= fa->total_nr_elements)
 		return -ENOSPC;
 	if (elements_fit_in_base(fa))
 		part = (struct flex_array_part *)&fa->parts[0];
 	else {
+		part_nr = fa_element_to_part_nr(fa, element_nr);
 		part = fa->parts[part_nr];
 		if (!part)
 			return -EINVAL;
@@ -252,8 +261,12 @@ int flex_array_prealloc(struct flex_array *fa, unsigned int start,
 	int part_nr;
 	struct flex_array_part *part;
 
+	if (!fa->total_nr_elements)
+		return 0;
 	if (start >= fa->total_nr_elements || end >= fa->total_nr_elements)
 		return -ENOSPC;
+	if (!fa->element_size)
+		return 0;
 	if (elements_fit_in_base(fa))
 		return 0;
 	start_part = fa_element_to_part_nr(fa, start);
@@ -284,6 +297,8 @@ void *flex_array_get(struct flex_array *fa, unsigned int element_nr)
 	int part_nr = fa_element_to_part_nr(fa, element_nr);
 	struct flex_array_part *part;
 
+	if (!fa->total_nr_elements || !fa->element_size)
+		return NULL;
 	if (element_nr >= fa->total_nr_elements)
 		return NULL;
 	if (elements_fit_in_base(fa))
@@ -343,6 +358,8 @@ int flex_array_shrink(struct flex_array *fa)
 	int part_nr;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	if (!fa->total_nr_elements || !fa->element_size)
+		return 0;
 	if (elements_fit_in_base(fa))
 		return ret;
 	for (part_nr = 0; part_nr < FLEX_ARRAY_NR_BASE_PTRS; part_nr++) {
-- 
1.7.0.4


             reply	other threads:[~2011-01-31  8:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-31  8:52 Steffen Klassert [this message]
2011-01-31 16:31 ` [PATCH] flex_array: Change behaviour on zero size allocations Dave Hansen
2011-02-01 10:24   ` Steffen Klassert
2011-02-01 11:03     ` Steffen Klassert
2011-02-01 14:55       ` Dave Hansen
2011-02-01 15:20         ` Eric Paris
2011-02-02  7:55           ` Steffen Klassert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110131085213.GK3070@secunet.com \
    --to=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.