All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: "Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@lsi.com>
Cc: "dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] multipathd: use 0 for initial pg if nr_priority_groups=0 (was: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dm mpath: allow table load with 0 priority groups)
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:34:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110131183445.GA13689@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E463DF2B2E584B4A82673F53D62C2EF4FF372B9C@cosmail01.lsi.com>

On Mon, Jan 31 2011 at  1:09pm -0500,
Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@lsi.com> wrote:

> Looks good to me. 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Snitzer [mailto:snitzer@redhat.com]
> > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 10:14 AM
> > To: dm-devel@redhat.com
> > Cc: Mike Snitzer; Moger, Babu
> > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] dm mpath: allow table load with 0 priority groups
> > 
> > If an mpath device is held open when all paths in the last priority
> > group have failed userspace multipathd will attempt to reload the
> > associated DM table to reflect that the device no longer has any
> > priority groups.  But the reload attempt always failed because the
> > multipath target did not allow 0 priority groups.
> > 
> > Adjust multipath target to allow a table with both 0 priority groups
> > and 0 for the initial priority group number.
> > 
> > All multipath target messages related to priority group (enable_group,
> > disable_group, switch_group) will properly handle a priority group of
> > 0 (will cause error).
> > 
> > When reloading a multipath table with 0 priority groups, userspace
> > multipathd must be updated to specify an initial priority group number
> > of 0 (rather than 1).
> 
>  Looks like we still have some action from multipath tool. CCing Ben..

Right, I looked in to the multipath-tools change.  Here is an RFC patch.

Inlined "FIXME"s pose the relevant questions.  I held off on having
select_path_group() return 0 when !mpp->pg because I wasn't confident
that I wouldn't break multipathd in some unintuitive way.

I did audit the various callers (indirect through setup_map call):

update_path_groups
ev_add_path
ev_remove_path

(all above first call setup_map)

setup_map()
  - mpp->bestpg = select_path_group()
  - assemble_map() -- establishes mp->params

do_map()

Even though I verified that much I wasn't completely confident in
changing select_path_group()'s defualt return of 1 -- so I localized the
change to where I _knew_ it was safe (assemble_map):

diff --git a/libmultipath/dmparser.c b/libmultipath/dmparser.c
index 1ef3aad..97b6420 100644
--- a/libmultipath/dmparser.c
+++ b/libmultipath/dmparser.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ assemble_map (struct multipath * mp)
 	int i, j;
 	int shift, freechar;
 	int minio;
+	int nr_priority_groups, initial_pg_nr;
 	char * p;
 	struct pathgroup * pgp;
 	struct path * pp;
@@ -60,9 +61,19 @@ assemble_map (struct multipath * mp)
 	p = mp->params;
 	freechar = sizeof(mp->params);
 
+	nr_priority_groups = VECTOR_SIZE(mp->pg);
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: make this conditional on multipath target version?
+	 * - but no existing code is conditional on multipath target version,
+	 *   nor does dm_drvprereq() store the version for code to do so.
+	 * - thing is older multipath never allowed nr_priority_groups=0 so
+	 *   it doesn't _really_ matter if initial_pg_nr=0 here...
+	 */
+	initial_pg_nr = (nr_priority_groups ? mp->bestpg : 0);
+
 	shift = snprintf(p, freechar, "%s %s %i %i",
 			 mp->features, mp->hwhandler,
-			 VECTOR_SIZE(mp->pg), mp->bestpg);
+			 nr_priority_groups, initial_pg_nr);
 
 	if (shift >= freechar) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "mp->params too small\n");
diff --git a/libmultipath/switchgroup.c b/libmultipath/switchgroup.c
index 025a95d..82c30ad 100644
--- a/libmultipath/switchgroup.c
+++ b/libmultipath/switchgroup.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ select_path_group (struct multipath * mpp)
 	struct pathgroup * pgp;
 
 	if (!mpp->pg)
-		return 1;
+		return 1; /* FIXME: return 0 here? */
 
 	vector_foreach_slot (mpp->pg, pgp, i) {
 		if (!pgp->paths)

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-31 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-31 16:14 [PATCH 1/2] dm mpath: fail message ioctl if specified path is not valid Mike Snitzer
2011-01-31 16:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] dm mpath: allow table load with 0 priority groups Mike Snitzer
2011-01-31 18:09   ` Moger, Babu
2011-01-31 18:34     ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2011-02-01 15:38       ` [RFC PATCH] multipathd: use 0 for initial pg if nr_priority_groups=0 Hannes Reinecke
2011-02-10 22:00         ` Mike Snitzer
2011-02-11 15:44           ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-02-01 15:40   ` [PATCH 2/2] dm mpath: allow table load with 0 priority groups Hannes Reinecke
2011-02-10 21:06   ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-10 21:13     ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110131183445.GA13689@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=Babu.Moger@lsi.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.