From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add framework Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:40:28 -0800 Message-ID: <20110131234028.8744b5fd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1296470024-26854-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <1296470024-26854-2-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <20110131153831.dca62146.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110131223859.27169db0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ohad Ben-Cohen Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Greg KH , Tony Lindgren , Benoit Cousson , Grant Likely , Suman Anna , Kevin Hilman , Arnd Bergmann , Paul Walmsley , Hari Kanigeri , Simon Que , Russell King List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:36:22 +0200 Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> I'll do a quick respin of the patches with that and the > >> hwspinlock_internal.h comment above. > > > > OK.. > > > > The patch series looks OK to me. > > Can I add your Acked-by on the non-omap parts when I respin the series ? spose so. I don't normally do acked-by's. I think it's my way of avoiding getting blamed when it all blows up. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: akpm@linux-foundation.org (Andrew Morton) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:40:28 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v4 1/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add framework In-Reply-To: References: <1296470024-26854-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <1296470024-26854-2-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <20110131153831.dca62146.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110131223859.27169db0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: <20110131234028.8744b5fd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:36:22 +0200 Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> I'll do a quick respin of the patches with that and the > >> hwspinlock_internal.h comment above. > > > > OK.. > > > > The patch series looks OK to me. > > Can I add your Acked-by on the non-omap parts when I respin the series ? spose so. I don't normally do acked-by's. I think it's my way of avoiding getting blamed when it all blows up.