From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from hsp-52.hspserver.com ([85.197.80.179]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pkvu4-0001tN-Av for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 10:55:05 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hsp-52.hspserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F425309C003 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:54:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from hsp-52.hspserver.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hsp-52.hspserver.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7mkP7FJKxjHX for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:54:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from rikrok.localnet (rikrok.physik.uni-bonn.de [131.220.167.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hsp-52.hspserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAC40309C002 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:54:09 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Zimmermann To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:54:08 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.27.45-0.1-default; KDE/4.1.3; i686; ; ) References: <20110203093253.GG4580@excalibur.local> In-Reply-To: <20110203093253.GG4580@excalibur.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201102031054.08764.ml@vdm-design.de> Subject: Re: libnl vs. libnl2 madness X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:55:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 03 February 2011 10:32:53 Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > The last hours I was trying to compile wpa_supplicant with nl80211 support. > That needs netlink support through libnl or libnl2. > > Enabling the option to use libnl2, not that easy to find, still breaks with > missing header files. Checking the libnl2 source shows that they are > provided. After some head on the table banging I found: > > commit 880e00d3b7ccf66d9421a06bc28e553e07842b59 > Author: Michael 'Mickey' Lauer > Date: Tue Nov 24 16:33:06 2009 +0000 > > libnl2: change includedir to not step over libnl1; also convert to new > staging At that time there was just one recipe depending on libnl2 and that was FSO2. I think one month ago JaMa has build the first SHR image without libnl(1), until then it was impossible because of some important parts. I'm not sure but i think the main blocker was bluez4 (Can't check now). But i think there are a lot minor packages that still require libnl and don't support libnl2. Regards Thomas