All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20110204143134.GE5393@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 9e7a475..ae57498 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
-On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 04:30:46PM -0800, Arve Hj?nnev?g wrote:
+On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 04:30:46PM -0800, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
 > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Mark Brown
 
 > > Would it not be cleaner for the affected platforms to ensure that
 > > clk_get() does the right thing here, for example by returning a dummy
-> > clock? ?Otherwise we'll just silently carry on if we can't get a clock
+> > clock?  Otherwise we'll just silently carry on if we can't get a clock
 > > we were supposed to which doesn't seem ideal.
 
 > This clock seem to be an omap specific virtual clock that switches the
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 63924a4..f2f734a 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,18 +1,24 @@
  "ref\01296701663-12168-1-git-send-email-arve@android.com\0"
  "ref\020110203124521.GK9810@sirena.org.uk\0"
  "ref\0AANLkTikybaV-jBo-q4Xb_POC5QRG9RRRV1RCDOnX9riG@mail.gmail.com\0"
- "From\0broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH 1/5] ARM: etm: Don't require clock control\0"
+ "From\0Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: etm: Don't require clock control\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:31:35 +0000\0"
- "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Arve Hj\303\270nnev\303\245g <arve@android.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
+  Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
+  Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  Alexander Shishkin <virtuoso@slind.org>
+ " Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
- "On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 04:30:46PM -0800, Arve Hj?nnev?g wrote:\n"
+ "On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 04:30:46PM -0800, Arve Hj\303\270nnev\303\245g wrote:\n"
  "> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Mark Brown\n"
  "\n"
  "> > Would it not be cleaner for the affected platforms to ensure that\n"
  "> > clk_get() does the right thing here, for example by returning a dummy\n"
- "> > clock? ?Otherwise we'll just silently carry on if we can't get a clock\n"
+ "> > clock? \302\240Otherwise we'll just silently carry on if we can't get a clock\n"
  "> > we were supposed to which doesn't seem ideal.\n"
  "\n"
  "> This clock seem to be an omap specific virtual clock that switches the\n"
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
  "why things are this way in the code (and the changelog) so someone\n"
  doesn't change the code back.
 
-a9e82bece12afe1f61cf4a1ac7a251ba0df0f4dcf8479617954a9b339cbaad2e
+235931ed19277f1751c3346af3674b644c781953352b2a9fb0c915bff10b91f8

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.