From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] usb_set_device_state
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 13:01:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102061301.56097.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1102052211040.9798-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
On Sunday, February 06, 2011, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Feb 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, February 05, 2011, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > On Sun, 6 Feb 2011, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > >
> > > > I got following message during booting mmotm-02-04.
> ...
> > > > It seems usb_set_device_state disable irq by spin_lock_irqsave.
> > > > But it calls device_set_wakeup_capable which ends up calling sysfs_merge_group.
> > > > It calls mutex_lock. :(
> > > >
> > > > Is it already known BUG?
> > >
> > > No, it was newly introduced by changes to the
> > > device_set_wakeup_capable() routine. Rafael, this sort of problem may
> > > occur in other places too, since previously there was no requirement
> > > that device_set_wakeup_capable() be called in process context.
> >
> > I'm aware of that, but it's only happend in a handful of network drivers so far.
> >
> > I think this is a new case in -mm, though, isn't it?
>
> I'm not sure. The USB core does call device_set_wakeup_capable()
> while holding one or more spinlocks in usb_set_device_state(), and that
> routine is called in several places. You ought to be able to duplicate
> the error on your own system simply by plugging in a USB hub.
No, I'm not. At least not with 2.6.37.
Also, I think the problem would have been reported before if it had been that
easy to reproduce with the mainline kernel.
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-06 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-05 17:15 [BUG] usb_set_device_state Minchan Kim
2011-02-05 18:25 ` Greg KH
2011-02-06 13:02 ` Minchan Kim
2011-02-05 20:11 ` Alan Stern
2011-02-05 23:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-06 3:19 ` Alan Stern
2011-02-06 12:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2011-02-06 12:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-06 12:53 ` Minchan Kim
2011-02-06 13:01 ` Minchan Kim
2011-02-06 13:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-06 15:23 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201102061301.56097.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.