From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 16:35:37 -0800 Message-ID: <20110209003537.GQ20795@atomide.com> References: <20110117192050.GE23331@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <0557426516de482c1769a50fa0b5f17a@mail.gmail.com> <20110208164747.GD6188@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <78d0134576ace6be5874871076cf0c10@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:42345 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756024Ab1BIAgJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2011 19:36:09 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Santosh Shilimkar , Russell King - ARM Linux , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org * Nicolas Pitre [110208 12:41]: > On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > > > > I think it's probably going to be better to _purposely_ break the > > > OMAP build when it covers v6 and v7 CPUs in these kernels as I don't > > > think it's sanely fixable given where we are. > > Agreed. At least making SMP unavailable when both v6 and v7 are > configured should be small and good enough for 2.6.38-rc5. That's probably the best solution as then we can still do boot testing on all omap2plus_defconfig boards. Tony From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 16:35:37 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels In-Reply-To: References: <20110117192050.GE23331@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <0557426516de482c1769a50fa0b5f17a@mail.gmail.com> <20110208164747.GD6188@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <78d0134576ace6be5874871076cf0c10@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20110209003537.GQ20795@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Nicolas Pitre [110208 12:41]: > On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > > > > I think it's probably going to be better to _purposely_ break the > > > OMAP build when it covers v6 and v7 CPUs in these kernels as I don't > > > think it's sanely fixable given where we are. > > Agreed. At least making SMP unavailable when both v6 and v7 are > configured should be small and good enough for 2.6.38-rc5. That's probably the best solution as then we can still do boot testing on all omap2plus_defconfig boards. Tony