From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@kernel.org" <stable@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwl3945: increase plcp check threshold
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 07:31:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110209063137.GD2184@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297180040.20613.39.camel@wwguy-ubuntu>
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 07:47:20AM -0800, wwguy wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 01:04 -0800, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > iwl3945: increase plcp check threshold
> >
> > Patch fixes:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654599
> >
> > Many users report very low speed problem on 3945 devices,
> > this patch fixes problem, but only for some of them.
> >
> > For unknown reason, sometimes after hw scanning, device is not able
> > to receive frames at high rate. Since plcp health check may request
> > hw scan to "reset radio", performance problem start to be observable
> > after update kernel to .35, where plcp check was introduced.
> >
> > Bug reporter confirmed that increase plcp check threshold fixed
> > problem for him.
> >
> > Reported-and-tested-by: SilvioTO <silviotoya@yahoo.it>
> > Cc: stable@kernel.org # 2.6.35+
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > Patch is oneliner, but does not apply on older kernel versions,
> > I will provide -stable patches when fix will land in mainline
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c
> > index 58213e7..27faa5e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c
> > @@ -2775,7 +2775,7 @@ static struct iwl_base_params iwl3945_base_params = {
> > .use_isr_legacy = true,
> > .led_compensation = 64,
> > .broken_powersave = true,
> > - .plcp_delta_threshold = IWL_MAX_PLCP_ERR_LONG_THRESHOLD_DEF,
> > + .plcp_delta_threshold = IWL_MAX_PLCP_ERR_THRESHOLD_MAX,
> > .wd_timeout = IWL_DEF_WD_TIMEOUT,
> > .max_event_log_size = 512,
> > .tx_power_by_driver = true,
>
> Do you see any help for 3945 with plcp checking at all?
Not really, I see only demage :-)
Ok, if we argree to remove plcp check from 3945 at all, I will
repost with slightly different patch for fix problem on stable.
Stanislaw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-09 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-08 9:04 [PATCH] iwl3945: increase plcp check threshold Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-02-08 15:47 ` wwguy
2011-02-09 6:31 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2011-02-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v2] iwl3945: remove plcp check Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-02-09 17:07 ` wwguy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110209063137.GD2184@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.