From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: document vbd numbering and naming Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:03:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20110210160346.GA1257@aepfle.de> References: <19793.24700.789052.113494@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1297353275.21980.370.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1297353275.21980.370.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Campbell Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Ian Jackson List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Feb 10, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 15:25 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > > +Some Linux HVM guests with broken PV-on-HVM drivers do not cope > > +properly if both hda and hdc are supplied, nor with both hda and xvda, > > +because they directly map the bottom 8 bits of the xenstore integer > > +directly to the Linux guest's device number and throw away the rest; > > +they can crash due to minor number clashes. With these guests, the > > +workaround is not to supply problematic combinations of devices. Is "hda and hdc" correct in this paragraph? Olaf