From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the staging.current tree Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:50:54 -0800 Message-ID: <20110210185054.GA15944@kroah.com> References: <20110210163527.3b2cc580.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:36843 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754903Ab1BJSva (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:51:30 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110210163527.3b2cc580.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nitin Gupta , Robert Jennings On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:35:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in > drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c between commit > 5414e557fca545614ceedc3d3496f747457e2e3b ("staging: zram: fix data > corruption issue") from the staging.current tree and commit > 2787f959d6c5fb258d964218ac75346019f49ee9 ("zram: Return zero'd pages on > new reads") from the staging tree. > > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. Thanks, I'll handle this when Linus takes my tree and I'll merge to resolve the conflict. greg k-h