All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf tools: Fix thread_map event synthesizing in top and record
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:00:00 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110210200000.GF20676@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49aai38yqa.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>

Em Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 02:40:29PM -0500, Jeff Moyer escreveu:
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> writes:
> > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> > Jeff Moyer reported these messages:
> >
> >   Warning:  ... trying to fall back to cpu-clock-ticks
> >
> > couldn't open /proc/-1/status
> > couldn't open /proc/-1/maps
> > [ls output]
> > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.008 MB perf.data (~363 samples) ]
> >
> > That lead me and David Ahern to see that something was fishy on the thread
> > synthesizing routines, at least for the case where the workload is started
> > from 'perf record', as -1 is the default for target_tid in 'perf record --tid'
> > parameter, so somehow we were trying to synthesize the PERF_RECORD_MMAP and
> > PERF_RECORD_COMM events for the thread -1, a bug.
> >
> > So I investigated this and noticed that when we introduced support for
> > recording a process and its threads using --pid some bugs were introduced and
> > that the way to fix it was to instead of passing the target_tid to the event
> > synthesizing routines we should better pass the thread_map that has the list of
> > threads for a --pid or just the single thread for a --tid.
> 
> Thanks for looking into this, acme.  Honestly, I can't for the life of
> me figure out from your description how this problem would have affected
> systems.  The fix makes the warnings go away, but I am still left with
> the hung system I originally reported.

I wasn't looking at that part, as described, I looked just at the
/proc/-1/status part, that -1. I.e. the part I hack on, the tools.
 
> So, what does this patch actually fix?  And do you or others have any
> interest in trying to work out why perf is hanging my system?

Peter?

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-10 20:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-10 18:51 [GIT PULL 0/1] perf/urgent fix for record and top Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-02-10 18:51 ` [PATCH 1/1] perf tools: Fix thread_map event synthesizing in top and record Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-02-10 19:40   ` Jeff Moyer
2011-02-10 20:00     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2011-02-10 20:11       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-11  7:05 ` [GIT PULL 0/1] perf/urgent fix for record and top Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110210200000.GF20676@ghostprotocols.net \
    --to=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.