From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: I wanted to check on the status of the memory leak in audispd, regarding RhEl 6 and audit-2.0.4-1.el6.x86_64. Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:11:02 -0500 Message-ID: <201102102211.02714.sgrubb@redhat.com> References: <27BFBC3607BD86489D06533C7F4401B10F8FE7FFFA@srv-win-mail01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from x2.localnet (vpn-239-174.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.239.174]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1B3B0pe013951 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:11:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <27BFBC3607BD86489D06533C7F4401B10F8FE7FFFA@srv-win-mail01> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com Hello, On Thursday, February 10, 2011 08:31:55 pm Jim Richard wrote: > Does anyone know if the changes to audispd regarding the memory leak that I > posted last year, and resolved by RedHat audit-1.7.18-2.el5, have been > applied to RedHat EL 6 audit-2.0.4-1.el6? I'm curious in that we are > starting to experiment with EL 6 and I'd like to know if this is something > that I need to watch out for. I've reviewed the change logs, but they > appear to be a bit spotty, in that they don't address the RedHat "-" > releases. Which of course this was. I'm also concerned since the date on > the EL 6 packages seems to be ~1/14/2010 which significantly pre-dates my > bug report. The fix was in https://fedorahosted.org/audit/changeset/443 You should find it in 2.0.6-1 and higher. -Steve