From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xemul@openvz.org,
sukadev@us.ibm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pidns: Don't allow new pids after the namespace is dead.
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 19:30:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110215183028.GA15568@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297788824-20534-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@free.fr>
On 02/15, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> In the case of unsharing or joining a pid namespace, it becomes
> possible to attempt to allocate a pid after zap_pid_namespace has
> killed everything in the namespace. Close the hole for now by simply
> not allowing any of those pid allocations to succeed.
Daniel, please explain more. It seems, a long ago I knew the reason
for this patch, but now I can't recall and can't understand this change.
> --- a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ struct pid_namespace {
> struct kref kref;
> struct pidmap pidmap[PIDMAP_ENTRIES];
> int last_pid;
> + atomic_t dead;
Why atomic_t? It is used as a plain boolean.
And I can't unde
> --- a/kernel/pid.c
> +++ b/kernel/pid.c
> @@ -282,6 +282,10 @@ struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns)
> struct pid_namespace *tmp;
> struct upid *upid;
>
> + pid = NULL;
> + if (atomic_read(&ns->dead))
> + goto out;
> +
So why this is needed?
If we see ns->dead != 0 we are already killed by zap_pid_ns_processes()
which sets ns->dead = 1.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-15 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-15 16:53 [PATCH 1/2] pidns: Don't allow new pids after the namespace is dead Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <1297788824-20534-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-15 16:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] pidns: Support unsharing the pid namespace Daniel Lezcano
2011-02-15 18:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] pidns: Don't allow new pids after the namespace is dead Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-15 16:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] pidns: Support unsharing the pid namespace Daniel Lezcano
2011-02-15 19:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 0/1] Was: " Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <20110215191521.GB16707-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-15 19:17 ` [PATCH 1/1][3rd resend] sys_unshare: remove the dead CLONE_THREAD/SIGHAND/VM code Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-15 19:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-21 0:17 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20110215191711.GC16707-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-21 0:17 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-02-16 23:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] pidns: Support unsharing the pid namespace Daniel Lezcano
2011-02-17 20:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-17 22:35 ` Greg Kurz
2011-02-18 14:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <4D5DA2CF.5010200-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-18 14:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <20110217202959.GA16076-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-17 22:35 ` Greg Kurz
[not found] ` <4D5C6219.8060207-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-17 20:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <20110215190118.GA16707-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-15 19:15 ` [PATCH 0/1] Was: " Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-16 23:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Daniel Lezcano
2011-02-24 1:12 ` Rob Landley
[not found] ` <1297788824-20534-2-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-15 19:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-24 1:12 ` Rob Landley
2011-02-15 18:30 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
[not found] ` <20110215183028.GA15568-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-16 23:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] pidns: Don't allow new pids after the namespace is dead Daniel Lezcano
2011-02-16 23:21 ` Daniel Lezcano
2011-02-17 20:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <4D5C5BE8.5020803-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-17 20:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-15 16:53 Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110215183028.GA15568@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@free.fr \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sukadev@us.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.