From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] suspend cleanups, refactoring and fixes (Was: Re: [PATCH] xen: suspend and resume system devices when running PVHVM) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:36:03 -0500 Message-ID: <20110215183603.GA27433@dumpdata.com> References: <1297704751-15612-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <1297779181.21980.3722.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1297779181.21980.3722.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Campbell Cc: Jeremy@acsinet11.oracle.com, Fitzhardinge , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 02:13:01PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 18:41 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > I am going to import it in the pvhvm branch I am preparing for the next > > merge window. > > Is there any conflict with the following series (which builds on this > patch)? It's not all pvhvm related but the bulk is the removal of the > separate xen_hvm_suspend function. > > Do you want to carry these in your branch for the next merge window or > shall I create a separate branch? Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk