From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: David Ahern <daahern@cisco.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@elte.hu, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf events: fix WARN_ON_ONCE for 64-bit raw data, SW events
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:04:50 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110218170450.GB302@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1298041291.5226.776.camel@laptop>
Em Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 04:01:31PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 12:53 -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > So size should be changed to u64 rather than modifying the
> > WARN_ON_ONCE?
> >
> > Yeah, I guess so, 32-bit has to die it seems, gets in the way of
> > testing
> > :-)
>
> No!
>
> 1) don't use RAW unless you have to
> 2) you don't have to, goto 1
> 3) if you do anyway, ensure its properly padded
Ok, but using that struct definition on 32-bit land, will lead to non 8 byte
alignment, right?
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-18 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-18 5:53 [PATCH 0/3] perf events: Add realtime clock event and timehist option David Ahern
2011-02-18 5:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf events: fix WARN_ON_ONCE for 64-bit raw data, SW events David Ahern
2011-02-18 11:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-18 14:33 ` David Ahern
2011-02-18 14:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-02-18 15:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-18 17:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2011-02-18 17:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-18 17:15 ` David Ahern
2011-02-18 17:17 ` David Ahern
2011-02-18 14:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-18 15:28 ` David Ahern
2011-02-18 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-18 5:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf events: Introduce realtime clock event David Ahern
2011-02-18 11:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-18 14:39 ` David Ahern
2011-02-18 14:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-18 15:35 ` David Ahern
2011-02-18 15:39 ` David Ahern
2011-02-20 12:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-18 5:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf events: add timehist option to record and report David Ahern
2011-02-18 7:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-18 14:28 ` David Ahern
2011-02-18 17:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-02-18 18:07 ` David Ahern
2011-02-18 18:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-18 18:45 ` David Ahern
2011-02-19 9:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-19 14:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-02-18 19:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-02-18 19:53 ` David Ahern
2011-02-21 21:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-02-18 18:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-02-18 18:47 ` David Ahern
2011-02-18 18:53 ` David Ahern
2011-02-18 19:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-02-18 19:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-02-18 20:30 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-02-21 21:17 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110218170450.GB302@ghostprotocols.net \
--to=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=daahern@cisco.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.