From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Cc: stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
"linux-pm" <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com, stable@kernel.org,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.37.1 s2disk regression (TPM)
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:48:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102201248.10779.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201102201151.11635.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Sunday, February 20, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, February 20, 2011, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 02/20/2011 11:44 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Sunday, February 20, 2011, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I'm unable to hibernate 2.6.37.1 unless I rmmod tpm_tis:
> > >> [10974.074587] Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
> > >> [10974.103073] tpm_tis 00:0c: Operation Timed out
> > >> [10974.103089] legacy_suspend(): pnp_bus_suspend+0x0/0xa0 returns -62
> > >> [10974.103095] PM: Device 00:0c failed to freeze: error -62
> > >>
> > >> 2.6.37 worked fine. Going to revert 9b29050f8f7 (tpm_tis: Use timeouts
> > >> returned from TPM) for testing.
> > >
> > > Yes, this has been confirmed to cause suspend regressions to happen
> >
> > OK, the revert works for me too... Are there any fixes?
>
> No, and the author and maintainer have not been responding. If that contiunes,
> I'll simply ask Linus to revert it.
BTW, the first hunk from that commit in drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c seems to be
completely broken:
@@ -577,9 +577,11 @@ duration:
if (rc)
return;
- if (be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.header.out.return_code)
- != 3 * sizeof(u32))
+ if (be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.header.out.return_code) != 0 ||
+ be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.header.out.length)
+ != sizeof(tpm_cmd.header.out) + sizeof(u32) + 3 * sizeof(u32))
return;
+
duration_cap = &tpm_cmd.params.getcap_out.cap.duration;
chip->vendor.duration[TPM_SHORT] =
usecs_to_jiffies(be32_to_cpu(duration_cap->tpm_short));
Namely, either the old code always returned as a result of the conditional
being removed, or the new code will always return as a result of
the (... != 0) check. I wonder if there's supposed to be (... == 0) instead?
[And why not to simply use 4*sizeof(u32) FWIW?]
Anyway, it looks like a good revert candidate to me.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-20 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-20 10:13 2.6.37.1 s2disk regression (TPM) Jiri Slaby
2011-02-20 10:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-20 10:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-20 10:46 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-20 10:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-20 10:57 ` [REVERT request stable-2.6.36/37] " Jiri Slaby
2011-02-20 16:50 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2011-02-20 16:50 ` Greg KH
2011-02-20 10:57 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-20 11:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2011-02-21 15:30 ` Rajiv Andrade
2011-02-21 16:34 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-21 16:34 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-21 16:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-21 16:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-21 17:12 ` Rajiv Andrade
2011-02-21 17:12 ` Rajiv Andrade
2011-02-21 20:39 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-21 21:29 ` Stefan Berger
2011-02-21 21:44 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-21 22:07 ` Rajiv Andrade
2011-02-21 22:10 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-21 22:10 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-21 22:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-21 22:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-22 0:42 ` Stefan Berger
2011-02-22 8:41 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-22 11:57 ` Stefan Berger
2011-02-22 11:57 ` Stefan Berger
2011-02-22 17:39 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-22 17:39 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-22 8:41 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-22 0:42 ` Stefan Berger
2011-02-21 22:07 ` Rajiv Andrade
2011-02-21 21:44 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-21 21:29 ` Stefan Berger
2011-02-21 20:39 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-22 5:39 ` Norbert Preining
2011-02-22 8:42 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-22 8:42 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-22 9:13 ` Norbert Preining
2011-02-22 9:13 ` Norbert Preining
2011-02-22 5:39 ` Norbert Preining
2011-02-21 15:30 ` Rajiv Andrade
2011-02-20 11:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-20 10:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-20 10:46 ` Jiri Slaby
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-20 10:13 Jiri Slaby
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201102201248.10779.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.