From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Brian Marcotte <marcotte@panix.com>
Subject: Re: NUMA problem with AMD G34 system
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 06:29:58 -0500
Message-ID: <20110221112958.GA25000@panix.com>
References: <20110219085932.E08B624258@panix5.panix.com>
	<4D6226F0.1080007@amd.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D6226F0.1080007@amd.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>
Cc: Brian Marcotte <marcotte@panix.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

> The SRAT CPU table seems sane, but the memory table seems to say
> that there is no memory on node 1 and 3, thus Xen will simply put
> those CPUs to node 0 as it cannot cope with memory-less nodes.

Ah. I think that's what was causing my confusion. Since the cpu-to-node
mapping was unbalanced and Xen wasn't complaining, I thought for sure
this was a problem with Xen and newer CPUs and I'd need to help with
debugging the problem.

In this case, I suppose I'll remove a CPU and rearrange the memory
until it's time to add more memory.

Thanks.

--
- Brian